Plainly from what you have said, the answer is yes normal is wrong because the logic behind your statement, this can be illustrated simply by mathematical formula for e.g. if X does not equal to Y and Y is equal to Z, it's then logical to think that X doesn't equal to Z.
however, the subjects from your statements which are judging (a verb), wrong(adjective) and normal (adjective), they are all sujective, really in this whole wolrd everything is subjective. for e.g. you say water is water because everyone else call this substance is water, the you use the formula H2O for such substance because everyone else uses this.
the point is whether if someone is judging or not is not defined objectively, if person A does or think such thing, and person B thinks person A is judging, whereas as person C does not, overall, person A can be judging or/and not judging, the same idea for the word "normal" and wrong.
your statement arise from your own conscience, thus the answer depends solely on how you think. the main difference between human and animals is that we think and this can be decribed as a method of energy transition (i will not go into that because it's rather more scientific), the final word is life espcially human behaviour can not always be predicted by formula this is same as what you are asking, you are asking something that's not formulable, refering to the first paragraph, the answer is yes because things are more absolute and objective ( the XYZ example)
finally the answer to your question is yes and no i.e. not answerable
2006-12-29 12:37:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by lippy19850528 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I wonder again......
What goes through your mind when you read the answers to your questions ?
Are you aware that you make people think a lot, think harder, think deeper ?
You must feel flattered.
Ok, here I go:
I would say:
Judging is natural, judging could be wrong, being natural is normal and being wrong sometimes is normal too.
Excelent questions !!
2006-12-29 14:17:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hello =)
Oh, I think that's a very logical, and proper conclusion, yes. You get a silver star for today, Dear.
I hesitate to say that judging is "normal".....I prefer to think of it as the "typical" state of humanity.......not the "normal" state. "Normal" implies a certain amount of justification, and that, most certainly, is lacking...
Namaste, and Happy New Year,
--Tom
2006-12-29 12:26:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by glassnegman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
judging is good.
being wrong is normal.
2006-12-29 12:32:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sometimes normal is wrong, not all the time.
2006-12-29 12:23:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Atlas 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
seems such as you supply in too surely and adult adult males do no longer take you heavily or admire you. you ought to admire your self in the past they are able to. a good thank you to prepare being taken heavily, replace your profile percentat here. Your women are putting out for all of us to be sure.
2016-11-24 23:54:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by sherri 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would be a generalization. ALL generalizations are bad.
2006-12-29 12:27:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
First we would have to define normal.......
2006-12-29 12:25:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by emotional blonde 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Normal" is such a relative term.
2006-12-29 12:24:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Joel A 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes we can
2006-12-29 12:32:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋