Or is the blood specific to all vampire Republicans
2006-12-29 10:36:03 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I vote for estra terrestrial
2007-01-02 10:15:35 · answer #1 · answered by screaming frenzy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Defending this country is a task Bush has taken and although some of his decisions are bad being able to carry the load says much for his character. Unlike Clinton, Bush put the fire out instead of throwing some water on it and wishing for the best. Clinton spent more time taking care of his needs than those of the country. His crotch controlled many decisions where Bush has been a moral president who cherishes his family not abuses them. Get off Bush's case .
2006-12-29 19:09:40 · answer #2 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I'll give the benefit of the doubt to those who voted for him the first time. The second time, you people should have known better. The blood is definitely on teh hands of those who voted him in the second time. Or those who tampered with the election to finagle a win for him! Watch HBO's Hacking Democracy!
2006-12-30 11:56:53 · answer #3 · answered by tcdrtw 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd like to think that people were just going "He'll learn from his mistakes" and then afterwards went "Well ****." When he didn't. I don't think that means that if you voted for Bush that the blood is on your hands though.
Did a majority vote Bush in? For ease of conversation, yes they did. But did *we* get a say afterward on if we wanted more troops sent to Iraq? No. Did *we* get to vote on how we wanted the entire Middle Eastern conflit to get fixed? No, we didn't. In the end, the current administration went "Ok yeah sure we can do that" and then totally ignored common sense, and did what they were going to do anyway. The only people who should answer for that are those who are currently in office.
2006-12-29 18:49:20 · answer #4 · answered by youdontneedtoknow 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I don't think you get the big picture here, guy. We are dealing with a bunch of madmen that are hell bent on destroying America. They brought war to our country with the 9/11 attack. What do you suggest we do, sit back and just let these people keep attacking. Get yourself educated as to whats really going on here.
2006-12-30 01:32:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Now remember GW is the Pro-Life President! ...hahahhahha
He has now killed more American soldiers than died in the Towers, wounded 20K plus more, this is not even taking into account the numbers of Iraqis.
The answer is yes and those of us who did not vote for him and sit on our buts have the blood on our hands also. Trouble is he has made the greatest blunder and once that initial mistake was made it is now very difficult to make it right.
2006-12-29 19:37:54 · answer #6 · answered by royboy 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋
blaming the voters is not the solution,besides the voters did not put Bush where he is ,34 presidents of the USA are related to Charles the great and Charlemagne
political parties and voting are part of a farce to satisfy the public but it is not the reality
those to blame are the illuminati no one else.
2006-12-29 18:46:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I am not sure that the people that voted for him does, but the people that still support him are just as guilty of mass murder and genocide as Bush is. There has never been a more criminal and corrupt president ever.
2006-12-29 19:41:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Saddam is going to be hanged shortly-if it wasn't for Bush-it would not be happening. I would like to be involved in being responsible for that !
2006-12-29 19:57:13 · answer #9 · answered by periellen38 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am afraid it is. If you support the Republicans and Bush you support pedophiles, liars, kidnappers, torturers, and killers. Voting Republican in most instances is a Sin and you should ask for forgiveness and never vote for people like that again.
2006-12-29 18:52:35 · answer #10 · answered by Stop K 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋