They begun winning games and they are second almost first in the Atlantic Division?
2006-12-29 09:53:16 · 9 answers · asked by My Poetry Is Deep I Neva Fail 4 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Yeah, it's been an unintended benefit. The Knicks have had fewer players available, the ones that are there are taking it upon themselves to step up their play and do better, and the team has played better as a unit and begun to show more consistantly. Now whether the can dstill o that once all their players are back remains to be seen.
2006-12-29 10:05:51 · answer #1 · answered by ccmonty 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Honestly, as of now, yes for the Knicks. Ever since that brawl, the Knicks have been playing great except against the 76ers (the Knicks probably loss because they were tired). Look at the Pistons game for example. The Knicks played their heart out in that game with great chemistry. Who knows what will happen when all the suspended players come back.
2006-12-29 18:02:07 · answer #2 · answered by ??????? 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Brawls in any sport is not good for business,,,as for the Knicks, they should have known better.
2006-12-29 17:58:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I think it sparked them. They r now 2nd in there division 1 game behind the raptors.
2006-12-29 18:07:44 · answer #4 · answered by Pekkle 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yse because since the brawl the knicks have been on a roll.
2006-12-29 18:11:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its the most action they have had in a very long time...."dont get upset" you know its true. Did you see the game in triple ot ?
2006-12-29 17:56:02 · answer #6 · answered by jshorePR 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well it seems to have brought them together so in that regard it was good for them but in terms of embarassing the franchise it was bad for them as now they have a rep for playing dirty and picking fights
2006-12-29 17:56:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont know if it was good for business but it hella helped the team so i liked the fight
ps zo is the best blocker swoosh swoosh
2006-12-29 18:02:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-12-29 18:10:16 · answer #9 · answered by yungjaf 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋