2006-12-29 09:51:43 · 28 answers · asked by hotod 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I agree with Karma police answer, but not 100%,
As yahoo answers are the best source to get first hand know how about public opinions.
Public opinion acts like Oxygen in Ono's life, for future planning in Governments matters, to whom all the Secret Services Support always.
As yahoo answer is the best resource centre for updated public opinions, I not only believe but 100% sure that such agencies not only monitor even sometimes participate in yahoo Q & A.
2006-12-31 23:22:38 · answer #1 · answered by Ishfaq A 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
12
2006-12-29 10:01:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's nothing secret about it. Check the white and pink papers that went through parliment post 911, by law any information that is considered a threat will be handed over, and anyone who refuses to give up Locks and Keys now face maximum sentancing. It would hardley be intelligence if it wasn't gathered.
Just look at the Carnivore program in the U.S.
Since the early 90's court cases against dealers have used information gathered by voice recognition programs on the U.K. payphone system, its there in black and white.
No, I'm not a mad conspiracy kind of guy.
2006-12-29 09:59:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The people who would actually need to be watched by the secret services would not, in my opinion, be stupid enough to communicate on a high profile internet site.
Unless some of the idiotic questions and answers I have seen are code for something more sinister...?!
2006-12-29 10:14:52 · answer #4 · answered by Don't Panic 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe not but there was a black limo parked outside my place for a few hours yesterday.
There is some monitoring of content on the Internet by various world agencies and has been successful in catching a few anti Americans
The profiles of each person and their questions and answers are good fodder for researchers, marketeers and sociologists and maybe even the CIA
Try typing the word "terrorist " in a few times and see if that black limo turns up at your place
2006-12-29 10:36:03 · answer #5 · answered by Zed 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Like The Cramps Green Fuzz. Better put yr hard drive through a shredder then burn it. The Una Bomber was apparently caught cos he made a deal to stop if the Wash. Post published him, and Govt. computing made a profile from his writing. Heavy duty computing we can't even dream of...
2006-12-29 11:36:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i've got no longer been around here that long, in spite of the undeniable fact that it style of feels oftentimes useful! And the reporting gadget looks relatively effective. as nicely whats the component of sensoring 'undesirable' perspectives, to make a rounded end, you like the coolest and undesirable. in case you propose undesirable as in irrelevent, then yeah, a paid website might ward off pointless q's/a's, in spite of the undeniable fact that it does no longer inevitably quit the die-confusing weirdos!
2016-11-24 23:41:36 · answer #7 · answered by richeson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hope they erase me, I'm a radical, i wear a Che Guevara t shirt and everything!
People don't care if they're being monitored anymore. Christ look at Big Brother! it's the one of the scariest things ever thought up but people look on it as a means of entertainment.
The world is broken.
2006-12-31 01:09:52 · answer #8 · answered by Richard H 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If not the Secret Service, you better know that Santa Claus is watching.
2006-12-29 09:59:52 · answer #9 · answered by Git r' done 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's quite possible.
The UK & US have advanced keyword algorithm software monitoring phone calls & electronic communications, like email.
Echelon scans for patterns of specific keywords, such as "kill" and "president" in the same communication. Words like, "SAS, bomb, spook, covert, MI5, SIS" are keywords that are picked up.
Too many Echelon pick-ups from one source will raise an alert and be looked into further.
So be careful out there!!!
2006-12-29 10:28:51 · answer #10 · answered by Cracker 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋