English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-29 09:40:46 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

if theyre spawning more illiterate shoplifting dumbfucks shouldnt we do something to maintain the national I.Q?

2006-12-29 11:25:29 · update #1

if you said yes, what are you doing trawling through "celebrity" questions?
where are the under 20s today such slavish sheep, obsessed with nobodies who've achieved nothing?

2006-12-29 12:47:35 · update #2

19 answers

I think we should sterilise the celebrities on reality TV.
"Big Brothers' little op"
"Celebrity Family Misfortunes"
"Celebrity Sex Swap"
"I'm a celebrity 'GELD me out of here'"!

2006-12-29 09:57:19 · answer #1 · answered by Dazzit 3 · 2 0

i imagine Beyonce is a function sort to those who favor to be suggested 4 their body and their sex attraction and in no way what their personality is. do not get me incorrect, Beyonce is the bomb and many folk like her track yet a number of her songs extremely do communicate about her body and stuff like that. So what i'm attempting to assert is that i don't believe of she is a perfect function sort for little ones. a similar is going for Tyra Banks because of the garments she wears and the failings she talks about. i have not heard a lot from Jennifer Hudson at the moment so i do not understand what 2 say about her

2016-12-01 07:44:23 · answer #2 · answered by haltom 4 · 0 0

how sad are you i live on a council estate but i have a good job and an education unlike you the only thing that should happen to those ladies is have their PJ's surgically removed but if we were all the same life would be boring you saddo

2006-12-29 09:55:26 · answer #3 · answered by LISA J 2 · 0 0

Hi Catweazle, I think you should be the first to be sterilised, because of your bad attitude towards those you consider to be lower then your self.

2006-12-29 10:00:00 · answer #4 · answered by Hi T 7 · 3 0

Hahaha....I guess if they do nothing but churn out kids (as some do) then after a point, say the 5th child...yes!

2006-12-29 09:44:04 · answer #5 · answered by doodlenatty 4 · 0 0

No let's sterilise the loser men who put them there. But of course we can't do that because the runaway b****ards can't even be found.

2006-12-29 09:59:36 · answer #6 · answered by Peace 2 · 0 0

No its the middle class ones I would like to do, who are supposedly educated enough to know better

2006-12-29 09:46:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes also kill anyone who watches and votes in on reality tv shows, all people in white tracksuit bottoms, rockport shoes and horizontal striped jumpers scum all inbred scum!

2006-12-29 09:59:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

why not go all the way and modify a fleet of transit vans into mobile gas chambers

2006-12-29 18:40:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

what about the drunks and druggies and teenagers who refuse to go to school or get an education in anything other than crime?

bad parents do not always make bad children and people can change once they hold their first child.

Similarily good parents do not always make good children.

2006-12-29 09:44:42 · answer #10 · answered by what? 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers