2006-12-29 09:04:17 · 15 answers · asked by BAARAAACK 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He would still be in his palace making plans, financing terrorists, and killing his own people in horrendously painful ways while still baiting the UN and USA as the liberals continued to call for "diplomacy.". He would be making lots of money from oil sales to the French and Russians.
2006-12-29 09:08:57 · answer #1 · answered by Git r' done 2 · 7⤊ 2⤋
That is a great question, he would still be in power, he would be alive, he would be still killing the people he didn't like and stealing money from his country. Supporting the radical Islamic fascists that are trying to kill people in Britain and USA. The world would be only at war with in the borders of the USA and Britain not the borders of Iraq.
2006-12-29 09:14:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If Liberals...? that is the wrong word Junior.. Progressives, (look it up) If Progressives had an actual hand in politics at all.. none of this would have happened. It's so ironic that people who identify themselves as conservatives run their mouths about this... Saddam is a right-wing Intelligence asset.. if you doubt it, Google the Rumsfeld Hussein handshake video.. or here http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/09/1445208
and this one is crazy..
http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/02-09-06/discussion.cgi.69.html
There are only fake liberals and conservatives in Washington.. very few, an extreme minority ...have any true connection to those titles at all... if only true conservatives and Liberals occupied our government, the world would be a completely different place..
2006-12-29 09:10:19 · answer #3 · answered by JC McDooglehowzer 1 · 0⤊ 4⤋
the country of Iraq would have been better off left alone . look at how many peoples have die because of our idiotic president bush their in a civil war . this country is under constant threats because of Saddam i wish it would have never happen Saddam was not a threat to the USA before all of this .i wish he was still in power the middle east was a more stable region
2006-12-29 09:33:28 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
How many years? Back before the REPUBLICANS put Saddam in office or before Bush decided to kill hundreds of innocents.
Bush didn't have to start a halfdone (because you can't say halfa- on yahoo) war resulting in more deaths than World War II. He could have waited for U.N. support, or used dimplomatic solutions.
2006-12-29 09:10:37 · answer #5 · answered by imajiknation 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Well, for one thing, he would still be President of a country with about 2.5 million more people than it has today. 655,000 Iraqis have died from Bush's war, and another 1.8 million have been made refugees.
Combined with the 1 million Iraqis who died from sanctions in the 1990s, that were not lifted even after Iraq destroyed its WMD, and whatever Saddam did to Iraq pales in comparison to what America did.
2006-12-29 09:12:02 · answer #6 · answered by libs_r_winning 1 · 0⤊ 4⤋
We wouldn't be discussing it, as we wouldn't be doing more than the fly overs we were doing after the Gulf War. Eventually despots get assasinated, so we might have done that covertly.
Oil would have be stable, and our treasury would have been full, and maybe if Osama had still sent the planes, we would have gotten the man responsible. But no, Osama is still out there and we are about to hang a very bad man...just not the bad man responsible for killing our people.
2006-12-29 09:10:30 · answer #7 · answered by justa 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
How about if Koo,Koo Ronnie Reagan didn't him support him in the in the first place?
2006-12-29 09:16:18 · answer #8 · answered by edubya 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would probably be in jail. The last few years were indecisive.
2006-12-29 09:08:57 · answer #9 · answered by Elerth Morrow ™ 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He'd be our star witness!! And folks like you and me would be much better off--imagine the end of Republican Hypocracy--man that sounds good!!
2006-12-29 09:13:25 · answer #10 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋