English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

During Saddam's reign, wasn't he responsible for killing mothers with their infant babies and thousands of Kurds?

2006-12-29 07:38:19 · 22 answers · asked by mister roy jones 2 in News & Events Current Events

22 answers

Yeah and throughout the reign of the U.S. we've been responsible for killing mothers with their infant babies and thousands of people around the world.

2006-12-29 08:07:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Saddam Insane killed over a million of his own people. Can you believe that some people don't think he should be hung this weekend? A firing squad would be more appropriate.

Iraq is about the same size in land mass and population as California. Can you imagine one person being responsible for killing one million people there?

2006-12-29 07:44:24 · answer #2 · answered by Colette B 5 · 0 0

He dropped chemical weapons on his own people, what this did was either it killed you by eating your skin, turning you inside out, poisoning you, and if you didnt die you were really messed up. He also claimed that there were traitors in his government and he started executing random government leaders to prove his power. Before he was president of Iraq he was pretty much a hitman. He is evil and the moment he dies will be a great triumph for americans and who ever out there hate bush is stupid because he did this, Saddam would still be killing if it wernt for him.

2006-12-29 07:47:51 · answer #3 · answered by Dolfanmiamiman . 2 · 0 0

Yes he was, why has anyone disputed this. I don't think he did the killing in person, he done it in the same sort of way as Bush, by getting the army to do it.

2006-12-29 07:41:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Yes he did, he also had his soldiers rape the teenage girls of Sunnis and Kurds.

2006-12-29 07:53:18 · answer #5 · answered by 2u-sister 3 · 0 0

Yes, he was a brutal dictator just like Chavez of Venezuela. For those of you not up on the news, I have included this tidbithttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6215815.stm

2006-12-29 07:39:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

SUPPOSELY YOU ARE RIGHT. I HEARD SOMEONE SAY THAT SADDAM WILL BE A BABY TO COMPARE WITH THIS ONE THAT WAS ELECTED. JUST SAW WHERE SADDAM COULD BE HUNG WITHIN HOURS

2006-12-29 07:44:24 · answer #7 · answered by bettys 4 · 0 0

Yepp he did bad man. But he was keeping the iranians at bay.

2006-12-29 07:42:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes he did, and for those of you that say it isn't right to murder him, you are wrong. Murder is killing an innocent person. Execution is killing a known murderer, and he is being executed, not murdered.

2006-12-29 07:52:59 · answer #9 · answered by Get Real 4 · 0 0

Yes. He was a horrible man!

2006-12-29 07:39:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers