Is anyone as pumped at me that finally the tyrant Saddam Hussein is about to die?

Question

I have to say its bittersweet a lot of americans have died over in Iraq for what i personally belive is dumb NOW it was ok at first but what exactally are we doing there still. I fought there in the very beginning and was there in the army when Saddam got caught and i personally am extatic that this "man" is about to finally die. Whats everyon elses opinion?

Answer 1

YES! I am glad the old b@stard is about to die. He has killed so many children and families. And he is the reason our soliders are away from their own families and put into harms way. I agree with you 1000%! Hang away, I say! But don't be surprised it you get a lot of bleeding hearts and wishy washy people replying to this, and even reporting you, they did it to me also!

Answer 2

What was the reason of you going to Iraq it was not Saddam it was OIL, go back into history Saddam was America's baby when they used him against Iran, now why has it changed, some people are going to become very rich by the hanging of Saddam and that will not be you, so why are you so ecstatic

Answer 3

George Bush's superiors sent those troops over to die in Iraq not Saddam Hussein. Saddam Hussein had no choice but to accept the Goddamn invasion. Why should you be so pleased that he's going to freakin' die? The goal of the campaign was initally to expose WMD's but all of a sudden it changes to "liberating Iraq" when they find out he hadn't commissioned any. Nobody else noticed that though.

Answer 4

Preaching to the choir regrettably. i'm undecided approximately your recount of the activities, yet i'm incredibly optimistic something occured. i could be greater beneficial than chuffed for somebody to cutting-edge good evidence of the chemical gasoline attack. there is been lots communicate approximately it from Bush and Blair, and no evidence positioned forward that I even question now regardless of if I even have ever considered a checklist showing that a chemical attack occured. to no longer say that it did no longer. it incredibly is been one in each and every of those long term i won't be able to bear in concepts. even nonetheless, I did examine one checklist that Iranian shells have been stumbled on on the scene. caught in my concepts cos it replaced into unusual. At a time whilst Iran and Iraq have been at odds, looks unlikely Saddam replaced into paying for from the Iranians. So i think i myself question who did it if and whilst it did ensue. Blair, flustered by employing journalists the different day for sure can not condone capital punishment with the aid of fact this is outlawed in the united kingdom, yet he did no longer do an outstanding deal to steer clear of the execution. i think my factors are: a million. He could have been tried before the Hague (international court docket of regulation, no longer one appointed by employing invading forces). each and every determination made by employing British and American governments is for self politcal benefit. 2. i don't experience innovative societies use capital punishment to punish crimes. It does no longer something for the sufferers, in basic terms satisfies the starvation of the human beings and Brits for revenge. Take the U. S.. the only usa in the Western worldwide that still imposes Capital Punishment, and has the utmost homicide fee by employing a mile. something to the order of twentyfold, for a inhabitants it extremely is on avergae in basic terms 4 situations as super as different western international locations. Why no longer enable him rot in reformatory in the eco-friendly zone? this is a tragic day for justice

Answer 5

Well, as I keep saying:
He should have been executed within the week of capture and done with no fuss or/and attention-grabbing for/by the radicals
The quicker the less terrorist attention - the less drawn out and general trouble we would have had.
If news media want to report anything, it should simply be when a terrorist is caught and brought speedily before trial.
That would slow down these terrorists remarkably.
While they are just getting the attention, they are loving it; like spoiled little children.

Answer 6

I like to imagine his neck snapping. I can almost hear the crunchy sound. Then I think about him suffocating for air. I can almost see his eyeballs turning red as his brain gasps for air. But the most fun is to imagine his body spastics as his nervous system goes haywire. Last night I dreamed that they forgot to put the hood on him so I could see his death grimace. But then in the dream somehow everything got turned around so it was ME hanging there. That was weird! But tonight I hope I dream that I am the guy pulling the lever.

Answer 7

Hell yes, I only regret I don't get to kill him myself. Of course, I would have shot him upon identifying him coming out of the spider hole -- letting him live has been an immense risk and probably contributed greatly to the insurgent terrorism. It's not like he could have been innocent and someone else was the "real dictator" (maybe OJ Simpson?). Though it's not over quite yet and I'll be happy when it's good and done with.

Answer 8

No, the crimes that Saddam committed are no way equivelant to the murder, torture and destruction committed by and supported by the U.S. over the course of history. Our troops died for greed and oil. They were sent there by a government that is filled with greed, they were not sent there to promote peace and prosperity and to aid a struggling people. Wake up!

Answer 9

a lot of you seem to be upset about genocide...hmm where else does genocide happen...SUDAN , why doesn't America fight a war against their dictator? Hypocrisy....

genocide is bad, but using it as a reason when you have an agenda is the real crime

Answer 10

ok, for the people who AREN'T extatic get ready.........think....GENOCIDE any one responsible for a genocide should be killed...and yes i am extatic but not for the USA but for everyone he murdered. Simple enough....i want to swear but this answers thingymajig won't let me! Smile you're on camera?!?