For christssakes! What is wrong with you all? The idea of women gettin crazy at 'that time of the month' is only true for SOME women, and if they were THAT unstable, other women would be intelligent enough to say they shouldn't be PM/President... Or are NONE of you educated? Also, a lot of women DO NOT CARE about fashion, 'womanly' music and other bitchy females... I'm pretty damn happy with my classic rock, thanks. And if a woman was going to rule a country, you'd hope they'd actually be clever. I know that's not the way you Americans like to do things, but most people tend to like someone with a brain running the place. So rules wouldn't have anything to do with fashion and what the leader personally likes...
Half the stuff you've said could be equally applied to men, it's such a damn stereotype... 'oh no! if men ruled the world they'd have football fields EVERYWHERE!' 'There would be no clothes except practical ones!' 'Everyone would be immature and no one would be allowed to show emotion!'
Oh grow up! Women are just as good as men at being leaders, just they don't get the chance (or havent in the past) due to being slaves to their biology (e.g. getting pregnant and breastfeeding), religion, and the fact that without rules against it, men are physically stronger and just pushed women around if they didn't obey.
2006-12-29 08:05:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by serf m 2
·
6⤊
4⤋
No, no. no... There would be disaster once a month for a full week and that is only if the week before and after are smooth sailings. The only good part would be the fact that the street designs(traffic), toilets in public places things like that would have a much better layout. But there are 2 ways I can see it going if a women took over. Because most women put up with BS in the name of love> you have the sissy women that can't make a decision because her other half won't answer the phone so in a peace meeting she would get pinked on a reg. then you have the one that has no more ca-passion because love has only let her down time an time again so she is for any an everything that would build her team of biter Americans. Besides all men have a strong women on there team rather it be a sister, cousin, friend, spouse ect. Even special ed a couple questions above. can you imagine a man being stoned for not keeping up with his child support.
2006-12-29 13:42:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Shyne 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well as much as i want to say that the world would be a better place, i cannot, because each and every human being has an irrational side.
The world would be the same as now, only the women would have a status much superior to men, because i don't see why the women would pass up an oppurtunity to do so, if they have taken over the entire world.
The world would be a better place for women, but for men....not so much. There would be a everlasting hunger for power, and eventually all men would lose every right, because the women would be in power and could do so.
For men, it would be as though they were the women, during the medievil times--with them being all considered intellectually inferior.
And then as time would go on, we would end up just like we are now.
The best thing, is men and women ruling together, and leadership being given to someone, not because they are men or women or black or white, but because they have good leadership qualities and a good heart and brains.
2006-12-29 09:52:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by navdeepkaur 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
If women took over what? Everything, totally everything? Just a straight swap? I mean, you have the capability of taking over now. Aren't there more women than men (in the US at least)? Why isn't there a woman president yet?
There are women who run countries. Indira Gandi was Prime Minister of India when they became the youngest Nuclear power. Margaret Thatcher is another leader. Queen Elizabeth II has ruled over England for some time.
There are women who run big firms. Carley Fiorina and Patricia Dunn both have been CEO's of HP (the world's largest IT company) for example.
There are women who run shops, are upper, mid and lower level managers.
Women are people just like the guys. I don't see much of a difference in how things are run if women were in charge.
The problem is the entire structure of things. Women who make it are generally competing in a man's world. Until the infrastructure is changed, women will still run things as if they were men.
2006-12-29 07:45:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by dm_gsxr 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
The world would not be safe or good any more.
Women usually gather in packs and often that can get into the way of clear thinking as they always want to know what everyone else thinks, it's a female thing. There may come a time where the head woman will have to make a decision that only she has to make alone with the knowledge her counterparts may agree or not agree and that I believe can be tough for a lot of women.
Women are too emotional and get too emotionally attached.
Now on the other hand the world may have to deal with less violence as their is nothing stronger than the firm hand of a mother.
The firm hand does not mean hitting; it mean a firm hand holding the reins of guidance.
2006-12-29 07:56:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Laela (Layla) 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
Most of the time, women exercise great amounts of control over the civilized world. They do so in ways that are harder to measure than the control that men exercise over the world. I won't detail the ways that women already have control of aspects of the world, I'll leave that up to you.
2006-12-29 09:13:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hahaha! Where've you been? Women have already taken over the world. 8-) Ok maybe not literally "taken over", but you know what I mean.. We're a force there's no doubt about that, but really I think BOTH (men and women) rule the world together.
You have to remember though, the man may be the head, but the woman is the neck, and the neck turns the head where it wants it to go. Lol
2006-12-29 08:23:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
what are you a retard?
Women control sex in this world that means everything we(men) have done is to get attention from the female sex so really women rule the world now
2006-12-30 04:21:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by SLICK77 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The world would be run on feelings, emotions and whatever feels good. That would create havoc. The world would never be a better place because of women. It's the "sin" nature in humanity that creates all the problems.....problems that all the best minds in the world can't resolve (nobody is holding back women nowadays either).
2006-12-29 07:30:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by zoomat4580 4
·
3⤊
4⤋
im sure i'd look prettier..and purplish..maybe..but considering women tend to be more emotional and more..well caretakers..there'd be a bigger attempt at peace possibly..i heard once from a teacher that women could take over the world but theo nly problem was that "no woman likes taking orders from another woman"..
2006-12-29 10:18:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sma 4
·
1⤊
1⤋