Oops read the question wrong the first time. I think it would not weaken it but change it somewhat. I believe this has happened before and the rest of us survived.
2006-12-30 02:56:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by nettyone2003 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If one race of Humans were wiped out it would not effect the gene pool as we know it as present, but it will affect the future gene pool.
There is enough variation in the races of humans to still create descendants without realising it, therefore unless you killed more than a countries worth, that gene would carry on in the lives of the remaining humans.
We are so inter-bred now that I believe it is impossible to kill off a full race of humans without killing the whole species of humans.
2006-12-31 00:07:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Becki_06 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think it would necessarily weaken the gene pool. The gene pool remains more or less constant. It may alter a future gene pool however, there's no real way of knowing.
2006-12-29 22:49:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by plwimsett 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
if an entire human race would disappear, then there would be no person on earth left. there is only one human race. if you meant that a race like african americans would dissapear, (no racism intended) then the world would only be without them. features like a flat nose or big lips would be very uncommon. the dna pool wont be weakened, rather be stronger. now there would be less variations for the chromosomes to reflect on features like eye color. thus humans would become in a sense more like one another and could become stronger.
2007-01-01 00:33:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by supaherounst 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would make another race very happy and would not change the gene pool much at all.
2006-12-29 07:18:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I geuss the hardestpart would be defining what qualifies as a race.
The wiping out of any large amount of people would affect the gene pool, and it would only have a greater affect if all the people wiped out all had similar genetic traits.
2007-01-02 01:20:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Grant G 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
This has already happened. In the 1800s the entire indiginous population of Tasmania was wiped out by Europeans.
2006-12-29 07:28:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
What precisely do you mean by utilising unnatural? Are you speaking of homicide and/or suicide? possibly mercy killing (while somebody is in such soreness that they ask a pal or scientific expert to easily enable them to die)? As for philosophy there are various theories approximately loss of life. unlike somebody else published "in philosophy it truly is the decide on of god" whoever wrote that possibly would not understand what philosophy is. it truly is greater of a non secular view of loss of life. besides many philosophers have written in super factor approximately loss of life. as an occasion, Heidegger observed loss of life simply by fact the crowning glory of existence. think of of it like a action picture. a action picture has a beginning up and end. existence is the comparable. And loss of life is the crowning glory of someone's existence. If somebody the place to no longer die then they might by no skill be finished, in accordance to 3 philosophical theories. I recommend interpreting some philosophy from the french and germans between the seventeenth and twentieth centuries. some that handle the subject be counted of loss of life in specific are Heidegger, Sartre, Camus, Nietzsche and various of their contemporaries. 2 books i might advise in specific are Being and Time by utilising Martin Heidegger and Being and Nothingness by utilising Sartre. the former is very a could study for somebody who's involved interior the subject be counted of loss of life.
2016-10-28 16:01:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would be a very sad day for mankind.
2006-12-29 17:46:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Social Science Lady 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that would be the end of the world ,i guess.
2006-12-29 07:13:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by squidbumps 2
·
0⤊
0⤋