Yes. He just doesn't have the right instincts. But he's worse than just not up to the job. He's responsible for the loss of many lives & the loss of our good reputation. This is not true of most presidents who weren't up to the job.
2006-12-29 05:40:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Judith 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, he approaches a job determined to do it the wrong way. That's more than incompetence. He believes in what he's doing which is why he sticks by it with an absolute inflexibility. He's just arrogant.
2006-12-29 05:40:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jordan H 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Don't think he was ever up to the job. That's why I find it hard to believe he won a second term.
2006-12-29 06:16:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Spatz Columbo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Agreed, though I feel much stronger than that about the man, and not in a good way.
2006-12-29 05:54:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well I disagree that he is NOT evil. He IS!! But he is the perfect storm of incompetence AND evil.
2006-12-29 06:59:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. He's a placeholder president for big business. He's a small functionary. The whole Iraq thing, way way beyond a man of his stature. That's why all the big talk. He knows he's outclassed.
2006-12-29 05:33:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by martino 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
Actually no, I would not agree. I believe what the end result of what we are doing in Iraq will be very beneficial for all western nations in days to come.
2006-12-29 05:33:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rich B 5
·
2⤊
4⤋
I would disagree. If he were not up to the job as you say, he would not be afraid of public opinion.
Part of being a good leader isdoing what is right, even if it is unpopular.
2006-12-29 05:33:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
No I think he has made some mistakes but overall he is doing a good job.
2006-12-29 05:35:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Yes!
2006-12-29 05:32:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Trapped in a Box 6
·
3⤊
3⤋