The former killed more Iraqis in 3 years than the latter did in more than 30 years. That's without mentioning the 3,000 American soldiers killed (and ten times more injured), or other civil casualties in Afganistan or indirectly (through indiscriminate support to Israel) in Lebanon, Gaza etc...
2006-12-29 04:54:16 · 17 answers · asked by s0190331 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I see your point but I don't want to Cheney in charge either! I don't like either one of them but at least Dubya will be out soon! You win some, you lose some as they say.
2006-12-29 05:02:57 · answer #1 · answered by rachee_gal 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush is a brutal, ill dictator that makes Saddam look like an absolute shaggy dog tale. Bush is likewise a mass assassin and traitor to america. Bush is by some distance the most hated and feared guy in historic previous, sweeping Hitler by thousands and thousands of votes.
2016-12-01 07:29:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ridiculous question. Iraqis have been killing each other for hundreds of years, and I don't think Bush had anything to do with that. I am sad for the 3,000+ American soldiers that have been killed, but didn't they CHOOSE to join the service? There hasn't been a draft that I know of. Yes, we should have just nuked the place and been out of there long ago, but then the American public would have a problem with that too.
2006-12-29 05:03:07 · answer #3 · answered by Chemist Chele 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Thats a interesting question. Asking if the President of the United States should be executed by the people that were gullible enough to put him into office in the first place. This is the kind of question designed to send a open invitation to Secret Service and FBI members to pay you a visit. Besides he has obtained his motive. Free gasoline, Fat rebuilding contracts for his bestist buds, a feeble excuse to wash his spending and for jacking up the price of gas into the upper atmosphere. However in the USA we have the duty to support our President no matter how benined or idiotic his decisions are and to wish one dead is somewhat criminal. Now with that said I will catch the bus to my minimum wage job that is 10 times below the inflation rate and stop by McDonalds for a 99 cents Double Cheeseburger that I am afforded a 10% discount when I show my U of Maryland Business degree and a Ronald McDonald for President badge. Remember, according to Mr Bush if your not for the war your not a Patriot.
2006-12-29 05:10:05 · answer #4 · answered by postmasterfsx 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Where do you get those numbers? I'll agree with the 3000 American soldiers .... but more Iraqi dead in last 3 years as compared to the previous 27 ?? If you are going to debate politics, get your numbers right .... makes for a more credible defense.
2006-12-29 05:07:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
No, Bush should not be executed along side Hussein. I also disagree with your information about how many people Saddam killed.
I am not a Bush supporter by any means, but to put him in the same category as Hussein is absolutely ludicrous.
2006-12-29 05:05:51 · answer #6 · answered by mdk1015 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Good lord, I don't know what Hallucinogenic substance you all use but wow it sounds like it is gooooood stuff to make you think like that.
Get over it, you lost in 2000 and 2004, stop being bitter, you got you victory in 2006, whoopty do!
If you honestly think Bush is evil and should be hung then your about as smart as my 3 year old neighbor, only he can stay in the lines when he colors.
2006-12-29 05:18:19 · answer #7 · answered by Stone K 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You seem to be misguided. The people of Iraq are killing each other. One religious group killing another religious group. Mr. Bush is clearly not guilty. Saddam, however, killed his own people for no reason. A rather big difference.
2006-12-29 05:03:28 · answer #8 · answered by Fran D 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Interesting point, I'm sure many feel the same but this kinda talk can have you under much scrutiny by the government. Saddam intentions were madness and hate. Pres was trying to get rich. Slap the **** outta him and kick him in the balls....but don't kill him
2006-12-29 05:00:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
YOU SEEM TO BE A TOTAL @SSHOLE. SHOULD WE ALSO HANG BILL CLINTON FOR FAILING TO STOP TERRORISM IN THE FIRST PLACE? SINCE BY YOUR LOGIC MORE THAN 3,000 AMERICANS DIED DO TO HIS IN ACTIONS. BUSH DID NOT KILL THE IRAQIS SINCE MOST OF THEM DIED IN SECTARIAN VIOLENCE. THE TALIBAN IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL OF THE PROBLEMS IN AFGHANISTAN. ISRAEL IS DEFENDING ITSELF FROM TERRORISTS BENT ON KILLING ALL THE PEOPLE & DESTROYING THE COUNTRY. THE LEBAANESE PEOPLE CAUSE THEIR PROBLEMS BY SUPPOTING HEZBOLLAH. IN THE GAZA IT'S HAMAS. DO YOU SUPPORT TERRORISTS?
2006-12-29 06:19:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋