Bush didn’t aimed at a certain tribe like Saddam did, he has done so much damage for killing innocent children too. I still remember seeing dead bodies of very small children and their mothers in the streets of Iraq on the TV.
Plus Bush deliberately demolished numerous mosques, which may seem a little thing... but demolishing Churches can be offensive to any non-religious Christen too.
Secondly, don’t u think this hanging will create a lot of unrest in Arab world… then why Americans will feel themselves insecure after any terror threat by them? who is the actual terror mind?
What you have to say?
I would like you people to be totally unbiased.
2006-12-29 04:53:35 · 12 answers · asked by ManhattanGirl 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I would like to see double standards end too. And that includes thinking it's acceptable and even necessary to kill someone because they killed. If laws purpose is to promote humanitarianism then it must uphold those standards in it's own actions.
2006-12-29 04:59:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
No, he should not. He committed no war crimes.
As to unrest in Arab nations, well, too bad. People say that and to me, it is a veiled threat. Being of the personality type I am, I don't react well to threats. As to religious landmarks and places of historical importance, President Bush did mention that our troops were instructed to do everything within reason to spare them. Within reason. In other words, if terrorist cowards are hiding in a Mosque, behind women and children and refuse to surrender, there is justification in blowing a wall open or using concussive grenades to disable them in the process of apprehension.
It really is not accurate to continue to keep saying that "Bush did this...Bush did that" when in fact, America has fought this war so weakly so as to avoid hurting anyone that it has almost been laughable. If we ever truly unleashed the dogs of war on these people, not a one would be left standing. I for one, hope we do turn the dogs loose soon. I want this war over and successful and we aren't going to win it the way we have been prosecuting it.
2006-12-29 13:02:22 · answer #2 · answered by Rich B 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
children dead in the street can not be tied directly to bush. they kill their own people indiscriminately. when munitions and "insurgents" hide in mosques, hospitals, civilian areas that causes the military to fight there sorry but if you follow rules that the other side is clearly using to fight against you you cant win a battle.
2006-12-29 13:06:08 · answer #3 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am being totally unbiased. This is war. This is a war created by Saddam. You want unbiased answers, yet you are totally biased. President Bush is a hero in my opinion.
2006-12-29 12:58:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Objectively, that's one of the more inane and mindless statements I've read in a while. How's that for "unbiased"?
2006-12-29 13:18:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Totally unbiased???you have room to talk.
2006-12-29 13:01:20 · answer #6 · answered by rosierotnass 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I tried asking this twice ... it got removed immediately...
but if i link to an as.s : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ano.jpg
it stays up there ?
neocon trolls like as.ses
YES BUSH DESERVES MUCH WORSE THAN saddam
2006-12-29 13:09:23 · answer #7 · answered by heil bushler 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Bush is a scumbag. He had no business getting our troops involved in the illegal Iraq war.
2006-12-29 12:56:57 · answer #8 · answered by Sean 4 · 2⤊ 6⤋
I thought you commies are against the death penalty
2006-12-29 12:57:59 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely!! Hang the little weasel!!! Or maybe just send him a bag of pretzels, he'll do himself in. However that would be to humane.
2006-12-29 12:59:02 · answer #10 · answered by The Pig! 5 · 0⤊ 6⤋