English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Personally, I'd go for Kane (or better yet nobody at all!). He's probably the only one who deserves it. Plus, there's all this talk about Batista possibly beating him next year, tell me what you think about this.

2006-12-29 04:53:28 · 26 answers · asked by Rockafella 2 in Sports Wrestling

26 answers

i agree, if any1 deserves to end takers streak its definatly kane. if batista beats taker ill be super pissed. a cocky new comer beating taker in their first meeting, thats bull ****

2006-12-29 04:58:34 · answer #1 · answered by 3 · 3 1

I'm a complete Undertaker mark, I have been since I was a little kid, so ideally it would be nobody. I don't think it should be Kane, because I've heard rumors that he's retiring, though I think it would be interesting. Under no circumstances should it be Batista. That man can't deliver in the ring, I don't think he deserves the honor and the giant push that would go along with ending Undertaker's streak.

After watching TTTT I have to say that even though his gimmick is reminiscent of the mid 90s Shawn Michaels, I want to go with Johnny Nitro. Johnny Nitro is incredibly talented, he's a credible heel, and he's a hard worker.

Honestly though...

I want my favorite wrestler of all time, Taker, to win the championship at Mania, and vacate it much like Trish did, and then retire after going 15-0.

2006-12-29 06:06:33 · answer #2 · answered by Renae 2 · 1 0

I think Batista may beat him next year but not at WrestleMania. Kane has fallen off to the point where he has to wrestle MVP (who really suxs) If it were the old masked Kane then I would go with him but at the moment there isn't anybody worthy to end Undertaker's Undefeated streak at WrestleMania.

2006-12-29 05:55:40 · answer #3 · answered by The Plague 4 · 0 0

Um...well it's a tough one.I wouldn't really go for the current Kane...the masked kane would have been a better choice..John Cena is a good option as he has already beaten taker once in his early days remember?! But taker showed at raw family reunion that he is still the phenom by chokeslamming john cena...I doubt that Batista can beat The deadman>>>can he deliver him a batisita bomb???Not too sure about it! Kennedy might cheat his way to a win as he has done a couple of times already! But if i have to choose it will be John Cena):

2006-12-29 06:08:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The Undertaker Beat Kane at WrestleMania already or atleast a Buried Alive Match. I don't know if anyone could stop the Deadman.

2006-12-29 04:58:43 · answer #5 · answered by A Jk Original 3 · 2 0

I think he should have his streak kept.
As much as I like Batista, I don't want Taker's streak to end. He did beat Kane twice at WrestleMania I believe.

Knowing Vince, he could find a way to screw Taker at Mania so Vince is the one who ends up beating him at Mania!

2006-12-29 05:22:08 · answer #6 · answered by mikea_va 6 · 1 0

i'm going to be the 1st to truly answer this precise in terms of the easily question asked IF i had to compliment one present day wrestler to end the streak it would be Kane in basic terms simply by fact Kane has had to activity to anybody in WWE whilst Taker have been given to stay close to the acceptable ( no longer asserting Taker hasnt had to activity ) i think of it would be tragic for Taker's streak to end yet while he lost at WM it would be much less complicated to retire

2016-10-28 15:48:03 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

kane is the only one worthy in the wwe to end the undertaker wrestlemania winning streak.Kane has been oberlook in this business and that would be a good way for the wwe to make up for it.

2006-12-29 06:19:32 · answer #8 · answered by jamaican babe 7 · 0 0

Jesus.

No one else deserves to end the streak.
Definitely nobody in wwe now or anytime soon.
It's respect. He earned it.
I bet if Batista doesnt, Vince puts that little prick rodimier over taker next w'mania

2006-12-29 05:28:05 · answer #9 · answered by anonymous w 4 · 1 0

ive said it before and ill say it again If the undertaker is ready for it to end it will.If he desides that he wants the gold again then hell take it. Besides hes in to good of shape to be retireing anyway. And to answer your question of who should do it? Theres noone on smackdown that is worthy to take him on.the undertaker is on a level all his own as the undertaker has already said: "THIS IS MY YARD"

2006-12-29 06:09:27 · answer #10 · answered by takersbabe 2 · 0 0

Anyone NOT named Cena or Batista.

They are getting pushed so much they don't need the rub off of a UT loss. Kennedy would be a good one to elevate off of a UT loss.

However, I think they should keep UT's record intact thru his eventual retirement. He's been a big part of WWE for so long, they should let him retire with the streak intact.

2006-12-29 05:00:54 · answer #11 · answered by Cruel Angel 5 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers