Can any liberal finally just confess they were acting stupid by saying that? Do any of you have so much as an ounce of courage to say you went over the top with lunacy and hyperbole?
I doubt it, that would take moral character and I haven't met a leftist liberal with any of that yet.
2006-12-29 04:14:44 · 19 answers · asked by netnazivictim 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's all a trick, Bush has replaced Nancy Pelosi with a clone who will follow the evil Republican agenda of stealing oil from Iraq and blowing up the levies to flood the black parts of town.
2006-12-29 04:16:05 · answer #1 · answered by x 4 · 8⤊ 8⤋
Moral character?
First of all you're generalizing. I don't think Bush is a dictator. Just a president that I don't agree with and I dislike liberals who blame everything on Bush or 9/11 on Bush or call him Hitler. He's not.
But instead of being the better man and showing some real "moral character" you decide to sit there and insult people? To generalize and make ridiculous statements (not as ridiculous as the ones you criticize, of course). Frankly, if you're going to criticize someone for going over the top that means that you yourself cannot go over the top 'less you want to be a hyppocrite.
So instead of being a biggotted fool who insults liberals for the actions of a few, howabout you just criticize the liberals who do stupid things like blame everything on Bush or maybe you should be less partisan and criticize conservatives who make mistakes too.
Or is that too hard?
2006-12-29 12:22:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He is not a dictator- However, some of his policies make him seem like one, and he has said that his job would be easier of he were one. The big difference that a lot f people don't' mention is that he does respect the results of an election, Even though he may not always let them be with no cheating (Look at FL in 2000 and OH in 2004)
However, once the results are in, he respects them, at least we hope. The 110th congress hasn't been sworn in yet- and there's still a week to go. A lot can happen in a week.
2006-12-29 12:21:24 · answer #3 · answered by The Big Box 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because the people have spoken. Bush is still a dictator. Just because it looks like a democracy, does not a democracy make. Lets remember his baby brother won the first election for him and America never votes a President out during war. Start a war stay in power. That sounds pretty manipulative to me, Dictator. Start a war to finish what daddy started, Dictator, not listening to anyone about that war and doing just what you want, Dictator. Lying to the world and to America about weapons of mass destruction and insisting he was telling the truth and making everyone follow him and ask no questions, Dictator. Oh ya lets not forget he consistently lie about it saying that it was true. Bush is a moron and he should be impeached for knowingly lying. He wont be though. Lying about something that starts a war and leaves a country worse off than it was is not has bad as getting head in the Oval Office. That's just insane......
2006-12-29 12:47:34 · answer #4 · answered by michael l 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
All I hear on here is how horrible the liberals are. That we are uneducated and just street people. If we are just that - why do you spend so much time putting us down? Why do you worry so much? Just wait and see what happens. Like Gerald Ford said, "The war in Iraq shouldn't have been started," Wow and he was a Republican? Your own kind doesn't even have your back? Somebody has to keep the country from going down the tubes by the hands of greed! GEEEEEEEZZZZZZZZZ-------- yawn!
2006-12-29 12:25:27 · answer #5 · answered by docie555@yahoo.com 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I am a liberal. I have never called Bush a dictator. I am concerned about his approval of using intelligence resources for domestic spying on US citizens. I am also concerned with his power to suspend the writ o fhabeus corpus for some citizens. However, I never have called him a dictator. I have heard some do that but most liberals I know have not made that charge.
So, do you have the 'moral character' to acknowledge that you have made a ridiculous generalisation here? Do you have the 'moral character' to admit that based on the limits of your experiences you have judged all of those who are liberal?
2006-12-29 12:19:53 · answer #6 · answered by toff 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
It's not like the Dems won by a landslide or anything. Let's wait and see what happens. I'll stick to my guns until after the New Year and see if anything changes.
2006-12-29 12:20:05 · answer #7 · answered by Faux News 2 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'm not a leftist, a liberal, a lunatic or any other "L" word, actually I'm an avid Republican but I say, "Bush has got to go."
Ronald Reagan would have been ashamed of him.
2006-12-29 12:21:59 · answer #8 · answered by ha_mer 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I never said Bush is a "dictator." I've said he's many other things, but not a dictator.
2006-12-29 12:19:50 · answer #9 · answered by homo erectus 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
He's not a dictator, he just wants to be one:
If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier... just so long as I'm the dictator.
-- During his first trip to Washington as President-Elect, Washington, D.C., Dec. 18, 2000
2006-12-29 12:18:56 · answer #10 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 4⤊ 5⤋
President George Bush IS NOT A DICTATOR ,, That's exactly why the Democrats are taking office ...
THANK YOU
EXCELLENT QUESTION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-12-29 12:17:58 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋