and why has the Bush administration proposed listing them as threatened? If the global warming we're experiencing now is just another "cycle" why has even Bush's admin agreed to list them as threatened?
2006-12-29 03:12:40 · 7 answers · asked by Dastardly 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
To captainobvious; You missed my point. Polar bears should be protected but if the Bush admin claims global warming is fake then why do they need protection? It's an obvious inconsistency in the bs they've been spewing...
2006-12-29 03:40:45 · update #1
Maybe from pre-human existence!
2006-12-29 03:17:43 · answer #1 · answered by Sami V 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Before everyone gets their dander up, remember that the ICE AGE and its eventual melting millions of years ago was not caused by humans.
Protecting the polar bears on their melting Arctic ice is the smart thing to do.
2006-12-29 11:33:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
so your logic is that since weather patterns are cyclical and now the bears are running out of places to eat we should not worry about protecting them? But if its not cyclical then we should? that's a little self absorbed dont you think? only help things if you caused it......
2006-12-29 11:32:18 · answer #3 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
2 years..Bush policy is killing the bears.
2006-12-29 11:15:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because there are less of them.
2006-12-29 11:14:53 · answer #5 · answered by Nate 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Santa has had problems with them for centuries.....
2006-12-29 11:20:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
you go dizz the fizz
2006-12-29 11:15:15 · answer #7 · answered by humanshit 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋