Saddam: Where Are The Voices Of Reasonable Men?

Question

Has every reasonable man in the world learned to fear Bush?
It needs for reasonable men to speak up on this issue before it is too late.
For moral and for numerous other reasons Saddam cannot be let die.
He must be punished, though.
And punished severely.
He has done wrong.
Serious wrong.
But his wrongdoing cannot be punished with more wrong.

Answer 1

Saddam needs to be punished but the trial was full of flaws and you must remember that unless you watch Iraqi tv news you wont get the full story. The news only reports what they want you hear.
Bush is making his country unsafe by taking on the arab states when he has no proof of anything going ie WMD.

Fighting for peace is like ***king for virginity!

Answer 2

I am reasonable!. I find it reasonable for him to be tried by an Iraqi Court, convicted by the same court, and sentenced by the same court. All under the same rules he tried to squash.

What I find unreasonable is that the Army Personnel that found him didn't drop a hand grenade down the hole he was in.

He sent many to their deaths screaming. Think of those innocents.

What I dread is that his spirit may be re-incarnated afterwards; as what?. look in 30 years time for the next vile creature to rule some part of this planet with greed, hatred and lust for power. That may be the wonderful Saddam reborn.

If he was in Britain, our Justice system would have let him out on licence after 7 years, and awarded him a house and Social Security and many ''Do
Gooders'' to assist him.

Better he is hung, and lets be rid...at least for a short time.

Answer 3

Me say no longer. First there has been alot printed presently on the topic of Iran & Iraq. those rebellion forces have been working together around the areas for some years. The WMD thought replaced into no longer new. Clinton bombed Iraq generally, blew the heck out of Sudan & Afghanistan finding for them and Saddam. He additionally pronounced he believed Saddam replaced into able to producing nuclear weapons. We had the Persian Gulf conflict. The physique count quantity 4 years below Clinton peacetime replaced into over 4,417. Who knows the $$ and then he extensively decrease militia budgets?? i think the lie is in the media effect of this the 2d Iraq conflict. no one lied. in actuality diverse Democrats voted for using tension to engaged with Iraq. Mrs. Clinton can no longer say sorry as she knew exceptionally others she replaced into precise. in basic terms makes use of it for marketing campaign purposes. whilst that's computer. As all of us understand she waffles, because of the fact the wind turns ectera etcetera... one element for specific is Iran is protecting. And the latest 2003 checklist I examine replaced into remarkable. Plus Saudi's presented to connect forces to income Uranium. frightening worldwide we are residing. CIA sez 5 yrs to be functional for Iran. tis what I sez mahalo edit: Sorry I have been given off difficulty. particularly definitely worth the money no conflict is in no way particularly definitely worth the money nor sacrifice of human lives. yet... we would desire to constantly evaluate the possibilities. no one particularly ever wins.

Answer 4

Wow are those bold statements. Saddam was tried for 150 deaths... he killed many more. I don't know if you are from the United States, but here people are hung for killing 1-5 people (depending on the situation) in other countries people are tortured before they are killed for cheating on their husband/wife. I believe he should be hung for this, and that punishment may be a little light... he killed thousands of people and you don't think he himself should die?? I think you need to study the laws and check your morals again!

Straight out of an article

In 2005, 78 nations authorized the death penalty for some crimes. Typically, capital punishment is reserved for individuals who commit the most violent or serious crimes, such as murder and treason. However, some governments authorize capital punishment for nonviolent or nonfatal crimes. For example, in Libya importing alcohol and trading in foreign currency are capital crimes.

Answer 5

This is up to the Iraqis. However, when someone has done the things he has, and there is absolutely no doubt he did them, he has forfeited the right to be treated like a human being. He has become a monster. His behavior is the same as a rabid dog and we shoot rabid dogs.

Answer 6

Absolutely. State sanctioned murder is not good. He gets off too lightly like this. Definately not to be shot if anything. Hanging is more barbaric and fitting of his crimes against humanity. Life without parole with hard labour is my option.
Peace

Answer 7

I think you absouletly right, he has done so much wrong, things that he had done were more than wrong, he should be prisoned for life, to suffer the consequences of his actions, by being executed its better for him in a sence, because it will put an end to his suffering, he should stay and suffer.

Answer 8

Saddam will actually dye by much nicer standards than his own method of killing people. I think his own methods of "punishing wrongdoers" should be taken into account here. Let's remember all of the Curdish ppl's demise........beyond sickening!

Answer 9

"For moral and for numerous other reasons Saddam cannot be let die."

What about the people he has killed? Plese explain the moral behind that? I bet you won't

Answer 10

He is being punished by the law of the land, unlucky for him they still have the death sentence, not like namby pamby Britain who lets criminals do what they want .