2006-12-29 02:57:56 · 10 answers · asked by Athene1710 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
1. SPELLING.
2. PUNCTUATION.
3. CONTENT.
4. WORDING, this includes the presence of hideous slang.
5. Whether or not it is intended to be a joke or serious:
John Stamos, Gummi, Chuck Norris, Edna Bambrick all get answered in jest, because they entertain Trunks.
2006-12-29 03:02:53 · answer #1 · answered by clever nickname 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Length - not long quotes of text (i think bible quoters are particularly prone to this), on the other hand all the relevent facts need to be included. Obviously, not ranting/racist language. Really bad spelling irritates me a bit as it shows the person hasn't even been arsed to think about their question properly. And it's usually good when the questioner has a relaxed approach to the issue - they haven't made their mind up already.
2006-12-29 11:33:15 · answer #2 · answered by Nikita21 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stupid questions get stupid answers. Questions which are just for the questioner to make a point which they will not change can get any response from derision to sarcasm. People who are real and open their heart get genuine responses but those who 'offload' are just asking for trouble.
This is a great question as is the reverse, how and why do we answer questions here. Is it being helpful or narcissistic.
Peace
2006-12-29 11:11:09 · answer #3 · answered by Knobby Knobville 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You have a nice picture Athene! :o)
My criteria is ssensible, honest answers and a bit of empathy and friendliness thrown in. I don't rate randomness and answers for answers sake very much in my humble opinion.
2006-12-29 11:02:02 · answer #4 · answered by terryscopic 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
for fun questions, sarchasm, wit and humour but not to the extent where it offends other people
for serious or questions that require thoughtful answers, is straight to the point, answers the question, is not a slur or abusive.
2006-12-31 07:46:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thoughtful and thorough ones. If there are more then one that fit that description, I'll choose the first one that came in.
EDIT: Nice thought, knobby knobville
2006-12-29 11:25:33 · answer #6 · answered by PhoenixRights 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good sarcasm and humourous and originality is all it needs. The lowest form of wit :)
I can't help myseeeelf
2006-12-29 11:41:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Humor and tact
2006-12-29 11:00:19 · answer #8 · answered by funnygrrl19 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sometimes the funniest, mostly the ones I agree with.
2006-12-29 11:01:03 · answer #9 · answered by glasgow girl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
humour, randomness
2006-12-29 10:59:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋