2006-12-29 02:40:49 · 19 answers · asked by Snance 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
No but Bush's should definitely be televised thoughout the whole world!
2006-12-29 02:44:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
Saddam Hussein's authorities could have carried out 61000 Baghdad voters, a determine lots bigger than in the previous believed, a sparkling study shows. So particular, He reward the in ordinary words ideal punishment for that on my own for my area.
2016-12-18 21:09:38 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes why not? And then we could also watch while vital organs are removed and put up for auction to the best bidder from organ donor clinics.
This is what happened in the Middle ages by the way. Sometimes they didnt hang them first. Just cut off the interesting bits.
You know, we really havnt com that far have we? Just got more squeamish.
2006-12-29 02:53:24 · answer #3 · answered by philip_jones2003 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes because he has executed many people and has televised it. Even in America it was televised...so I don't see why this event is any different. I remember when he made this mother of twelve kids e executed by her own brother because she stole a piece of bread for her kids. They had her kneel in the cities square and her brother chopped her head off and walked away with a smile. So it should defiantly be televised!
2006-12-29 02:59:09 · answer #4 · answered by Trini-HaitianGrl81 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Definitely no. There is no point in televising a person's hanging, regardless of how brutal/cruel the person is. If you were to witness his death, you'd be stooping yourself to the level of such bad people.
2006-12-29 03:05:58 · answer #5 · answered by aguardiente3 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hell to da yeah I want to see em swing all the soldiers that have dies because of him yeah as a whole we should be able to decide whether we want to watch it or not so put it on pay per view and let em SWING!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-12-30 05:28:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
was timothy McVeigh televised?
well don't count on that happening here with sad-dam Insane
martyrdom is apparent, so lets take a day off of work to watch this crap.
2006-12-29 02:47:01 · answer #7 · answered by iroc 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, I think that whatever crimes he is guilty of there are many other leaders guilty of similar. If we are not going to hold those leaders accountable for their crimes then I do not think it is fair to celebrate the death of the one leader that got caught.
Saddam was put into power by the U.S. now the U.S. is facilitating his execution. It's an interesting story. I feel sorry for Hussein, his family, the individuals he killed, and the family of the individuals he killed while in power. There is no happy ending to this story.
2006-12-29 02:45:09 · answer #8 · answered by AJ 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Absolutely not! I will go as far to say he should have been left alone in his country to rule as he was for years and years. Why did the US have the right to invade Iraq and try and make them a democracy....that is what you should be asking.
2006-12-29 02:46:40 · answer #9 · answered by kincaid 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It would be the most televised show this year....and the most profitable if it were on pay per veiw.....with all proceeds going to veterans groups.
2006-12-29 02:49:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Nope. It is the Iraqi government's punishment and it is their decision to televise it in their own country.
2006-12-29 02:45:46 · answer #11 · answered by slwilson1966 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋