Why do americans continue to vote for Bush after 9/11?

Question

Havent they seen Loose change? It may not all be fact but it does show that there has been cover ups
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5651675924179685534&q=loose+change

For the very last time i am not a muslim!!!!!!!! why does everyone think that? I'm as english and athiest as they come. If i was a muslim i'd be pretty pissed of that i was being persecuted for a crime i didnt commit tho, are we really supposed to believe that the fire was so hot it melted the structure of the towers, yet the hijackers passport was found in the rubble???

Answer 1

Because he wears sharp suits and has a really really nice smile kinda like a gimp

Answer 2

Answers with truth are no longer needed for this subject as people will hear what they want to hear no matter what!

I think the majority must have access to more complete information than those that watch the MM's, CT's or watch videos like loose change.

Some facts are simple and some are so complicated that one twisted phrase or word can change an entire event... I give you "Loose Change".

Not that Bush hasn't been a part of some serious mistakes, that's a given but, there are no secrets in Washington. If MM wanted to make a movie that all would watch, he could start out by calling it "Loose Brains", a comprehensive study of politicians (liberals and conservatives) and how they all lie!

Answer 3

There were no "cover-ups". As for voting for Bush, he was the only viable presidential candidate for 2 elections. The 2004 opponent was a terrible person and a terrible candidate. A man whose only accomplishment, besides marrying very wealthy women and getting elected, was to indulge in traitorous activities during the Vietnam war. The only thing on his resume was that he fought in Vietnam almost 40 years ago!

Perhaps if the Democrats has nominated someone who was competent, who understood the grave threats facing the US and Western Civilization, who was patriotic who understood the Constitutional limits on government and understood that socialism was contrary to the freedoms and rights this country was founded upon, it would have been different.

But that's not going to happen, is it?

Answer 4

"it may not all be fact but it does show that there has been cover ups".....Do you READ what you write??

And WHY NOT vote for GW after 9/11? We have NOT had another attack in this country. The economy is doing great, the stock market is at an all time record high, unemployment continues to go down and I for one feel safer having a REAL man in office.

Of course the "vote" was two years ago, so I don't know how we still "continue" to vote for Bush.

Answer 5

Considering the British people re-elected Blair, a known liar and his government of spin, mostly using the reasoning that my father voted Labour so I do and the other 75% of the population stayed at home. May be next time, of course in the States there will not be a next time as Bush has used his two lives, shame the Labour government is not treated the same.

Answer 6

You need to catch up. Who claimed the steel structure melted? It failed, due to the fire that weakened steel. That is why steel is fireproofed with a coating. But if that fireproofing is blasted off by jet explosion, then yes steel can and did fail.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/research/4199607.html

http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/

http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/911NutPhysics.HTM

http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king911.htm

How much structural design experience do the producers of Loose Change have? None, I bet.

If the buildings had been made out of steel reinforced concrete, then they may have stood the impact at least long enough for evacuation.

Answer 7

Loose change is a farce. And the US voted him back in for a second term to let the terrorists know we stand behind our President and don't just buckle under from pressure caused by the terrorists. So we needed to vote him back into office for that reason. That's also why I feel we need to vote in an extremely strong person in, in 2008, to let the terrorists know we won't be pushed around like the French are being pushed around.

Answer 8

I doubt most Americans would now vote for Bush as witnessed in the kicking his party got in the recent elections. As for the twin towers - 9/11 incident, I see no conspiracy theory.

Answer 9

"Perhaps if the Democrats has nominated someone who was competent, who understood the grave threats facing the US and Western Civilization, who was patriotic who understood the Constitutional limits on government and understood that socialism was contrary to the freedoms and rights this country was founded upon, it would have been different."

I think you'll find >that< Democrat out playing unicorn polo with Santa and the Tooth Fairy.

Answer 10

Well I'm reminded of what my mother in law said, she said that she'll look at both candidates but the democratic candidate already has a point against him because his a democrat. So that implied to me that she was basing almost everything on party first and politics second. So I think that's a big reason of why people voted for Bush a second time, they voted based on party and not politics. Also there was a big confussion after 9/11 of who did it, why and how. The Bush administration pointed a finger and because many Americans were still mad at the fact that 9/11 happened, they believed everything they were told without questioning.

Answer 11

I've heard alot of American's are not registered/ can't be bothered to vote, so perhaps they don't continue to vote for him, because they never voted in the first place!