English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

An article in the December 2006 issue of DISCOVER magazine described the number as "2.4 billion billion."

Is this description correct? Why, or why not?

2006-12-29 01:49:27 · 5 answers · asked by Nettie1247 1 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

5 answers

Interestingly, there's no global standard on how to name numbers that are 1,000,000,000 or greater.

According to the table at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers, 2.43 x 10^18 should properly be called "2.43 quintillion" in the American system and "2.43 trillion" in the European system.

I thought maybe they chose to call the numer 2.43 billion billion to avoid this controversy... but since that number would be 2.43 x 10^18 in the American system and 2.43 x 10^24 in the European system, even that reason falls flat.

So I conclude that Discover called it 2.43 billion billion (in the same way that a million can be called "a thousand thousand") in order to emphasize how big it is. Humans have at least a vague concept of the enormity of a billion (thanks to Sagan? ;)) but almost no concept of how big a trillion is, let alone a quintillion.

(Another interesting related article on this issue, which shows which countries use which system, is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales .)

2006-12-29 02:17:13 · answer #1 · answered by Jim Burnell 6 · 0 1

I think it is correct.
1 billion is 10^9, which is 10 with 9 zeroes after it.
So a billion billion is 10^18, which is 10 with 18 zeroes after it. That would be this number if the leading 2 were a 1 and the rest of the numbers were zero. So this, instead of being ONE billion billion is approximately 2.4 billion billion.
Strictly speaking it is 2.432903008 billion billion.

2006-12-29 01:58:33 · answer #2 · answered by firefly 6 · 0 0

In the US it would be: 2 quintillion, 432 quadrillion, 902 trillion, 8 billion.

In the US the number would be 2.4... billion billion.

In the UK the numbers go up by millions, not thousands. So the number would be: 2 trillion, 432,902 billion, 8,000 million OR: 2 trillion, 432 billiard, 902 billion, 8 milliard .

Use scientific notation and it the same all over the world.

2006-12-29 05:06:57 · answer #3 · answered by smartprimate 3 · 0 0

In the US defintion, a billion is 10^9.
The bumber you show is about 2.4 * 10^18.

Since 10^18 = 10^9 * 10^9, one can say that the units are indeed a billion billion.

2006-12-29 02:01:17 · answer #4 · answered by Jerry P 6 · 0 0

according to US conventions, 1 billion = 10^9
therefore, 1 billion billion = (10^9)*(10^9)= 10^18
therefore, the number you have given is 2.432902008 * (10^18), i.e 2.432902008 billion billion and approximately equal to
2.4 billion billion

2006-12-29 02:22:32 · answer #5 · answered by angad m 2 · 0 0

ehh... no. "billion billion" is just a way of saying "quintillion". They don't like getting into anything higher than trillion. So if you hear a kid say "I wish I had a million billion trillion dollars." then he means $1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, or an octillion.

2006-12-29 05:31:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers