1999 CLK320 3.2L(18V)
2002 E320 3.2L(18V)
1997 E420 4.2L(32V)
1999 S320 3.2L(24V)
Hi I'm thinking of buying a MB one of this models is a possibility all range between 60-80,000 miles.
What are the major differences as far as handling, performance, maintenance cost and reliability.
All comments will be greatly appreciated.Thanx.Eli
2006-12-29 01:30:33 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Cars & Transportation ➔ Car Makes ➔ Mercedes-Benz
It all depends on what you want from a vehicle. If you're looking for comfort, smooth power and ride then consider the S320. If you are more race oriented then think about the E420 since it has a V8 in it. Reliability wise I would choose the 2002 E320 because it's newer and Mercedes' vehicles tend to be more reliable the younger they are. The CLK320 could be a good choice but don't assume it'll be as sporty as it looks since it only has a V6, which should give you enough power in most cases, nevertheless. Like I said I'd personally choose the 2002 E320 because it's newer, more reliable, refined, and up to date. But then again I'm not the one buying am I? Good luck.
2006-12-29 11:45:37 · answer #1 · answered by Car freak 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would get the newest model, the 2002 E320, its the newest and most fuel efficient. or get a brand new mercedes C230 which MSRP around 30 K.
2007-01-02 03:32:27 · answer #2 · answered by Star-Scream 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋