and those that gave him the WMD, Satellite maps, and the knowhow to carry out the heinous crime.
2006-12-29 00:57:15 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Few are willing to accept the US role in Saddam;s vicious behavior. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A52241-2002Dec29?language=printer
The information in the above link is the kind that comes out,usually long after the fact and in the back pages of the papers. Bush Sr. and Rumsfeld supported, armed, and trained Saddam and his minions, and though they did not commit these atrocities themselves, they do have their fingerprints on the outcome. If we were honest with ourselves, we could at least talk straight about topics like your question. But as we are mostly still in denial, you will be bashed for bringing this up.
2006-12-29 01:30:04 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The evidence is there and Saddam is responsible for the murder of thousands of Kurds and his "heinous" rule has finally come to a halt. There are hundreds of documents that prove Saddam committed these acts.
http://www.khrw.com/crimes.html
2006-12-29 11:27:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You drive a car. One night, you have one too many at the local pub. You hit a nighttime jogger. Should the police file charges against Ford Motors? Jeeze man...you really amaze me the way you continue to keep reaching further and further.
In one question, you state Saddam never had WMD, then in this one, you ask who gave him the WMD.......make a choice.
2006-12-29 09:03:13 · answer #3 · answered by Rich B 5 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Oh don't tell us, the killing of the Kurds was a vast conspiracy of which Saddam had no role. And he seems vicious enough to figure out how to kill a bunch of people.
2006-12-29 09:14:27 · answer #4 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why would anyone have to give him anything??
Heck, he had some of the best biological scientist in the world working on it.
2006-12-29 09:37:36 · answer #5 · answered by devilduck74 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
OJ Simpson has a book comming out about that.
2006-12-29 09:07:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You see. Your countrymen will never accept that weapon producers in the west stoke conflicts to sell weapons. Nobody asks, would there be so many deaths if the conflicting sides fought without technologically advanced weapons? Wake up, people!
2006-12-29 09:09:43 · answer #7 · answered by Totally Blunt 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yes, the UN must be brought to brought to justice as well.
2006-12-29 09:10:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Its already well known, that in the middle east the Kurds are considered the lowest of the low.....
2006-12-29 09:03:40 · answer #9 · answered by AD 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Shh we are trying to keep your name out of it.
2006-12-29 09:01:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋