HI all
I dont think so. But again it depends on some factors:
1) City: Bigger cities, no probs.
2) Economic status: Well off or economically independent, No probs i wud say.
3) But if dependent or living alone (if not accepted back by parents), then, Probs like expoitation can be an issue.
But on the whole outlook is much beter tan what i was a couple of years ago.
a useful indian link:
http://www.1equals2.in
care,
gill
2006-12-29 18:27:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gill 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is not a problem in general. You might find an isolated case, but lets not generalize the situation. Divorces are quite common everywhere incuding India. Thus I dont think you will be socially outcast of you cant keep up with a husband.
2006-12-29 00:37:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Shiv 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
it depends where you live and what situation you are in.in big cities people hardly care.at least all the people who have some work to do and are busy doing something constructive hardly care!people who have a lot of time on heir hands and the types you call the serial watchers are more likely to have a regressive and narrow approach to such a situation.the best way to have yourself accepted in the society is by accepting yourself as a part of that society first.forget thefact that a person is divorced or not!building a career and giving their child a better life must be thier topmost priorty rather than acceptance!divorce is no taboo at least not in the 21st century!people make mistakes, they are bound to its nothing to be ostracised about!!so i would advice such people to just live their lives on their own rules and strugle to reach the top and be the best!live in normality rather than whining for acceptance!no one made these rules the laws.these are just mere conventions of this damned society!there is no law that says that you need to follow them!
2006-12-29 05:15:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by s4e 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, not nowadays...Divorce is a common phenomenon in the metros of India...
Absolutely no problem at work or friends at work....you can rest assured there...
Indian society is not what it used to be 10 years ago...
get involved in a Divorcees forum to know more...
2006-12-29 00:29:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Shubho 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i understand i'm going hostile to the Dragon in this one, and that places me at an instantaneous disadvantage, yet i in my opinion extremely like Michael Cole. i imagine that many human beings right now dislike him because he replaced Jim Ross on raw. I thoroughly agree that that change right into a foul decision by Vince, yet it truly is why human beings favor to keep in thoughts. That it change into Vince's decision, not JR's and in no way Michael Cole's. i don't believe of that Cole and The King have great chemistry mutually, yet even as he change into teamed with JBL or Tazz he change into staggering. a number of the perfect statement that i have ever heard got here from Michael Cole even as aspect cashed in money contained in the commercial company lower back in 2007 hostile to the Undertaker. keep in thoughts, good after Undertaker tied with Batista in that metallic cage journey? Cole did the kind of strong pastime of putting emotion into the journey that it made it a classic second and extremely set aspect up even extra then he already change into as a significant heel. The statement is a great area of any WWE journey. great statement can turn a lengthy and dull journey right into a classic. i extremely imagine that Cole has that potential. as a lot as I loved Christian's go back, i did not imagine that the statement change into strong. this is to undesirable, because regularly Todd Grischam is extremely strong and that i appreciate him, yet when Jim Ross or Michael Cole were saying that, it would want to have made the on the spot a lot cooler. do not get me incorrect, i could not end smiling both way, inspite of the indisputable fact that the statement extremely did make a huge difference in a adverse way. i imagine that contained in the lengthy time period, Striker and Grisham favor to be chop up up. For the most area Grischam is sturdy, yet Striker is merely soooo extreme. He receives stressful.
2016-12-01 07:16:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes… you are partially true. It depends on the society you live. Financial strength is the key to all these issues. A divorced woman can live a good life. This is your life!! You have the right to live it any way you want. So cheer up lady!!
2006-12-29 00:27:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Valentino 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Still in India, Divorce is seeked for real reason, unlike the West.
isolation / friendship has nothing to do whether you are married / unmarried / divorced / single.
2006-12-29 19:38:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by RASUNA 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
ya buddy.....
in here itz not like urs ,who marry 10times in a lifetime......
in india,relationshipz r very strong....n marriage is 1nce in lifetime.....
in india gardlu 1 in a millon get divorceed.......n in that case it dependz in which society u belong too... n if any problemz arises itz problem only for women....
if men get divorced ,they easily get maried 2 other,but women is not so easilyallowed to get maried....
any tauntz given to ,is also a women......
2006-12-29 00:43:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by unlucky hand 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no dear
don't fear ... u will spoiling urs and ur child's life if u still be with ur husband ... think abt urself and not others ... no one will be sad when ur sad .. everyone enjoys seeing u in trouble do u care for those ppl ...as long as u earn good ... i would say u will reach a situation ppl come asking u for help rather then u going for them
be brave ..u have everything u want in life .. and ur child .. go ahead and all the very best ....
2006-12-29 01:44:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A single woman with child is and can be mistreated by everyone including family and friend s .
2006-12-29 00:31:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by -----JAFO---- 4
·
0⤊
0⤋