Saddam Husain?

Question

I am seeing beautiful comments from my friends on White House's festival of his execution. Someone said that I shud b hanged after him. How nice!! I must salute that friend. Anyway, my point was like this. There have been several such politicians (like saddam and bush), who committed similar crimes of killing innocent people. If u remember idi Amin, Uganda. He liked to shower in the real blood bath (human blood). But, USA did not care about the people of Uganda. Even Idi Amin lived his life after he had deported to some other country and had natural death. It means that people of the rest of the world (except USA) should not evaluate things as projected by USA. If they are humans, people of the rest of the world are also humans. Policy should be uniform for all dictators. If one was acquitted, why would Saddam be convicted?

Answer 1

Trying to draw comparison like this are useless because we do know that life is not always fair. Matters of law are specific to the country in question and each situation must stand or fall based on it's merits and circumstances. Saddam Hussein may have been removed from power by the United States military, but it was the Iraqis themselves who judged him. Yes there have been many despotic leaders in the world, and in a perfect world they would all get their just rewards, but we do not live in a perfect world. You can view this however you wish. For me I will take justice where I can find it.

Answer 2

There are several things at work here. Firstly, we can't police the *entire* world. It costs too much money, time, troops, and resources. Second, I don't think we have any interests in Uganda. Third, the war in Iraq is just a continuation of what Bush Sr started with the Gulf War, believe me, 9/11 was just an excuse to do it. Notice how stubbornness runs in the Bush family? He didn't give up even when he knew he lost the election in 2000.

Besides, governments really don't want to police other countries' governments. If country A invades country B because government B did something perceived as bad (eg unjust executions), then country B (and every other country with similar practices and beliefs) has a good reason to attack country A.

It follows that any government of any country doesn't particularly care about people any other country. Heck, the government doesn't care about people in its own country either; the only thing a government cares about is staying in power. If the people of the US want to see the government fight terrorism aggressively, then the government will do it. If the government has interests in Iraq, it will create a reason for people to believe we should go have a war in Iraq.

Answer 3

No. Hussein being long previous is appropriate to the *in simple terms* solid element to come again out of the conflict. As undesirable simply by fact the conflict and insurgency are, enable's no longer forget approximately that Saddam grow to be a brutal dictator. Shed no tears for Saddam. besides the undeniable fact that, I do have faith that as long as we occupy Iraq, the area is in simple terms no longer resolved. we've dealt with issues so badly over there i do no longer see how an all out civil conflict could be prevented.

Answer 4

Was saddam given a chance to leave Iraq before the war began? Yes he was, he chose to stay. He was captured and is in US custody. We will turn him over to the Iraqi's since the are the ones that convicted him and sentenced him to hang. He will be hung by Iraqi's.

Answer 5

THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT IN THE RULE OF A DICTATOR SOMETHING GOES WRONG. IT IS ALSO SAME IN DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY. IT IS NOT ALL BECAUSE OF THE KING OR PRESIDENT. SO WHOLE THE BLAME NEVER GOES TO THE KING. IN MY OPINION SUDAM HUSSAIN WOULD NOT BE HANGED. IT IS ALSO AGAINST THE HUMAN BEING RIGHT.

Answer 6

Did you help Poison Gas 180,000 kurds?
You should go to Saddam and tell him how much you support him.

(Bush saves lives---doesn't take lives.)