Is studying from an LSAT book that was made in 1995 a good idea...It wont be my main study source but I was wondering if it was worth studying at all???
2006-12-28 22:48:28 · 6 answers · asked by Hamid S 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Higher Education (University +)
I think it's worthwhile *as long as* it's a collection of the official tests. The LSAT really hasn't changed too much since then. For what it's worth, when I was studying for the LSAT I took every single published test and it really paid off -- I ended up with a 170+
2006-12-30 10:53:16 · answer #1 · answered by jdphd 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd pick a more current one, but the LSAT hasn't changed much in years. You'll get the idea and practice that's helpful for the test.
Check your local library. They should have more current copies of test books. Or, just download samples from the LSAT website itself.
2006-12-29 06:17:57 · answer #2 · answered by Linkin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
pick a more recent book with recent test...
also, i heard on the official lsat website that the test is changing for the june 2007 exam in the reading comprehension sections, so once books come out that have those new changes, you should probably buy those...
2006-12-29 11:48:34 · answer #3 · answered by light12 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i might want to come to a decision on a extra cutting-edge one, inspite of the indisputable fact that the LSAT hasn't replaced a lot in years. you will get the idea and be conscious it truly is efficient for the try. inspect your community library. they could ought to have extra cutting-edge copies of test books. Or, merely download samples from the LSAT internet web site itself.
2016-12-01 07:15:36 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't - Standardized tests change frequently so their format and content is going to be very different from the tests given 12 years ago.
2006-12-28 22:56:57 · answer #5 · answered by jp 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Was it your idea??>>>...........
There's your answer
2006-12-28 23:02:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋