Great observation! You are apparently more educated than the masses and know a lie when you hear/see one. There is no terror (beyond the usual region-specific revolutionary type that's always existed). 9/11 was orchestrated by the U.S. and Israel (see scholarsfor911truth.org/), but for different reasons. The U.S. will begin building a Superhighway next year that stretches from the S. Texas Mexican border through the Midwest up to Canada for the purpose of facilitating a North American Union parallel to the European Union (see Congressman Ron Paul's website). The Cristian West recognizes through the revelations in Samual P. Huntington's book, "Clash of Civilizations" that they will never get the Muslim world to accept this one world globalization, so we need to create pretexts for wars against the Muslims. 9/11 was made possible by carrying out 15 different "war games" by the military simultaneously and at the same location of the "attacks". Same thing in london on 7/7. The British authorities were carrying out "anti-terrorism" exercises at the exact same time and location as the bombings. The Indonesian authorities have investigated the Bali bombing and the trail leads to the U.S. military. Same thing with the Spain train bombing. The U.S. military pays "contracters" $30,000 per month (per Melissa Rossi, "What every American should know about who runs the World), to carry out "military operations". So the war on terror is a fabrication to minimize the muslim numbers and establish puppet presidents in Muslim countries. Bush is worse than Hitler becasue he is utilizing total and absolute deception, while Hilter was only mildly secretive. But the "power" you pose in your question is the absolute correct word. Thanks for not letting the Bush regime make a fool out of you like they have millions of others. Stay informed. Get your news from the internet, dvd's, and the international press. And inform others. This is our country. Eventually...we will tell...Bush...
2006-12-29 03:51:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by protocols 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Absolutely NOT! That's like comparing apples to toilet paper.Different set of circumstances. Way different. We're there to combat a threat and keep the extremists from attacking us again on American soil. Hitler was set on creating a master race and killed Jews for no reason. Now I don't want to hear that we're killing for no reason also or any of that bull**** either. Yes, I feel that we've lost our main focus by spending too much time in Iraq while Al-Queda runs free along the borders of Pakistan and Afghanistan (which is where a majority of our military effort should be concentrated) but if we quit now, then it's only a matter of time before we get hit again, possibly on a larger scale.
2006-12-29 00:55:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tiberius 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I suppose from some perspectives it could be seen as such. I do not beleive it is, but I do see where you are coming from. I feel it is an unwinnable war, but not based on the principles of ethnic cleansing and genocide. While the war is argueably inhumane, it is not based on the same principles that fueled the Nazi's. We are not attempting to wipe out an entire race/religion, but rather attempting to destroy all that which poses a threat, even if our enemies are... somewhat difficult to identify.
In short, I do not feel it is based on the same principle, so it is not like that of Nazi Germany. However, I could agree in some instances, the act is the same.
PS please forgive me for the bad spelling, it is 4am here.
2006-12-28 22:58:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
did you recognize that Pat Robertson claimed that God instructed him that the international might come to an lead to 1982...!! "In previous due 1976, Robertson predicted that the top of the international grow to be coming in November or October 1982. In a could 1980 broadcast of The seven-hundred club he reported, "I assure you by utilising the top of 1982 there is going to be a judgment on the international."
2016-10-28 15:20:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will say no, it's not the same power, I don't support the war in Irak, but Hitler created a killing machine of huge proportions and wiped out millions to create a super race, nothing to compare..☺
2006-12-29 00:21:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not quite.
Bush has replaced 'super race' with 'democacy and freedom' by limiting your freedom and making a lot of peopl afraid to leave their homes.
Take away the holocaust from Hitler and Iraq from Bush, then compare the two men as politicians.
2006-12-28 23:21:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by philip_jones2003 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're joking right? Gassing 6 MILLION people just for the fun of it by an insane Nazi can never be compared to anything else.
2006-12-28 22:57:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Debra D 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
no...it's the other way around. In the U.S., if a President acted like Hitler, he would be replaced and put under a mental evaluation. It behooves me that an entire country could sit back and take the extermination of fellow human beings, without drugs, or something being put in the water supply ! Hitler was a nut! And then he became a coward when he killed himself.
2006-12-28 22:57:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Scorpius59 7
·
0⤊
1⤋