2006-12-28 21:26:44 · 10 answers · asked by eonquest 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
pros. we see them for the criminals they really are.
cons. we have the coffins as proof.
2006-12-28 21:38:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
911 will be the main Bush dynasty. All the actions that have followed will be paraphrased within that context. Even the large deficit will be rolled in. This will be done incorrectly as war spending accounts for only a fraction of the increase. The hate exhibited by many for this president will be a non factor as will his approval ratings. History rarely remember political discourse, but rather concerns itself with major events of the day and their outcomes.
2006-12-28 21:33:44 · answer #2 · answered by Bryan 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush's Dynasty ended last November!
2006-12-28 21:29:07 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no question they are pros, and that they should be cons. This BushCo is one of the Darkest chapters in the history of government, ranging from supporting genocide in Nazi Germany and grandpa Bush to supporting genocide in Iraq with the grandson, and hopefully history, if not the Democrats, will reveal what a sinister force they have been.
2006-12-28 22:49:45 · answer #4 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The word "dynasty" just appears too grand to associate with junior.
A nasty blip in history shouldn't be considered a dynasty.
2006-12-28 22:22:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is no downside! The US needs Bush family "political power brokers, using their Ivy League network, vast wealth, and questionable political maneuvering to obtain the White House and consequently, shake the foundation of constitutional American democracy"
http://www.amazon.com/American-Dynasty-Aristocracy-Fortune-Politics/dp/B000BNPGAU/sr=8-1/qid=1167389629/ref=pd_bbs_1/105-7263197-4401225?ie=UTF8&s=books
2006-12-28 21:58:28 · answer #6 · answered by Snowshoe 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lower income tax, reform SS to supply drugs, initiated the Dept of Homeland security, nominated two fine Supreme court justices. On the negative, the media hates him.
2006-12-28 22:26:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It most certainly is a dynasty. The problem with the Bush dynasty is that they are all shite.
2006-12-28 21:34:34 · answer #8 · answered by Cracker 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Cons. They are definatly cons.
2006-12-28 21:57:13 · answer #9 · answered by here and now 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it isn't a dynasty
that term is just liberal propaganda
2006-12-28 21:33:01 · answer #10 · answered by Jon H 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋