So can it not be reasonable that God still created all that is here in this universe through evolution/physics despite all religions documentations which much of can not be substantiated? I think if you excluded all the religions of the world there would be more credible evidence of a God.
If there is no god where did everything come from? If you answer this question too, you better say something a lot more intelligent than the big bang theory, I do believe some people probably have an intelligent answer.
2006-12-28 19:50:55 · 7 answers · asked by leseulun 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
I am thinking maybe you dont understand my question or the String theory one or the other because the string theory is a theory regarding how physics might be causing our universe to fluctuate and perhaps an element of the big bang. Still a theory based on plausible physics, so I dont see how the String theory proves or disproves a god??
2006-12-28 20:06:38 · update #1
Though the big bang may of been part of the creation of our existence, it likely wasnt the origin of existence. So when I ask for something more intelligent than the big bang I am looking for something that digs a little deeper and has more sustenance. There are tons of theories as to the predecessor to the big bang and other alternatives. While none of these theories can be proven, they are viable and cant be disproven and seemingly more solid than just "The big bang"
2006-12-28 20:15:14 · update #2
Where did god come from? A crackerjacks box! Seriously I know thats a good question but I dont think the answer to that question is required to answer either of these questions I posed. I would love it if someone had a good theory on that one though, where did God come from?
2006-12-28 20:19:25 · update #3
There is no evidence of any intervention of God since before Planck time, a moment (10^-47s) after the big bang. Natural processes can explain everything about the world and the universe except where the universe and the natural processes came from.
2006-12-28 20:20:32 · answer #1 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, that's cute. Take away THE answer. Then tell us to come up with something else. Which of course can easily be criticized because it's the wrong answer. Hey, I've got a question for you. What is 2+2 ? You better say something more intelligent than "4".
2006-12-28 20:06:56 · answer #2 · answered by Count Acumen 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you consider science as a religion?
If no, Science is one proof that God exist.
All those theory explaining where it all began but they never explain the specifics. Like the big bang theory, It did not explain where the big ball of mass came from. Or the other theory that explains that there is a cycle of big bang theory but did not explain where it originally began.
2006-12-28 20:04:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
String theory.
2006-12-28 19:53:18 · answer #4 · answered by X 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God makes himself non empirically provable on purpose.
2006-12-28 19:52:47 · answer #5 · answered by xx_muggles_xx 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there is a God where did God come from?
You see that type of argument can work both ways.
2006-12-28 20:07:24 · answer #6 · answered by minuteblue 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is no god.
So there is no evidence to find.
If there was, we would have found it by now.
2006-12-28 21:08:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋