English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-28 19:03:23 · 2 answers · asked by shil 2 in Politics & Government Politics

2 answers

Violent activities in the region declined in 2004. There are two main reasons for this: warming of relations between New Delhi and Pakistan which consequently lead to a ceasefire between the two countries in 2003 and the fencing of the LOC being carried out by the Indian Army. Moreover, coming under intense international pressure, Islamabad was compelled to take actions against the millitant's training camps on its territory. In 2004, the two countries also agreed upon decreasing the number of troops present in the region.

Under pressure, Kashmiri terrorist organisations have made an offer for talks and negotiations with New Delhi, something which India has rightfully welcomed with both hands.

India's Border Security Force blamed the Pakistani military for providing cover-fire for the terrorists whenever they infiltrated into Indian territory from Pakistan. However, ever since ceasefire has come into action, the terrorists get no back-up from Pakistani Military which has contributed significantly to the decline in cross-border terrorism in the state.

In a recent development, Pakistan's interior minister, Sheikh Rashid, was alleged to have run a terrorist training camp in N.W. Frontier, Pakistan. Islamabad dismissed the charges against its minister as an attempt to hamper the ongoing peace process between the two neighbours.

Both India and Pakistan have launched several mutual confidence-building measures (CBMs) to ease tensions between the two. These include, more high-level talks, easing visa restrictions, restarting of cricket matches between the two. The new bus service between Srinagar and Muzaffarabad has also helped bring the two sides closer. Pakistan and India have also decided to co-operate on economic fronts.

A major clash between Indian Security Forces and terrorists occurred when a group of insurgents tried to infiltrate into the Indian-administered Kashmir from Pakistan in July 2005. The same month, also saw Kashmiri terrorist attack on Ayodhya and Srinagar. However, these developments had little impact on the peace process. The mood on both sides of the border finally seems to be moving beyond a half-century of confrontations.

Some improvements in the relations are seen with the re-opening of a series of transportation networks near the India-Pakistan border, with the most important being bus routes and railway lines.

2006-12-28 19:26:47 · answer #1 · answered by az helpful scholar 3 · 0 0

nicely in the event that they do open up borders for civilians, it could greater be used to transport violent human beings from the two area. you recognize what I imply. it is not that Pakistan is the only one which has terrorist or violent human beings to socity. Even India, there are some human beings available in India who do no longer help Muslim human beings residing in India. As i pronounced those numbers are very small. eighty% of Pakistanis and Hindustanis want peace. shouldn't the two usa celebration and over throw the undesirable matters or suspects in case you will. As for the defence element you suggested, its all gonna bypass on as long as we don't positioned my opinion in action. If Pakistan buys sixteen F-sixteen from US, India could purchase 32. in the event that they purchase 32 then Pakistan could decide for 40 Raptor-22 combatants. So, those race is purely gonna bypass on. that's the ordinary human beings of the international places who would desire to place rules and ragulations in action. no longer each element could be accomplished by Politics or secret companies you recognize what I imply. See, I stay in US and that i'm no longer American yet, yet I nonetheless help US seize undesirable human beings like drugs and prostitution and property you recognize. with the aid of fact i understand that that is gonna help all the rustic in some way.

2016-12-18 21:00:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers