English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I do think so, as no animals are hurt in the process if the meat is cloned without being alive.

If you disagree: Why?

2006-12-28 16:32:58 · 18 answers · asked by Ejsenstejn 2 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

18 answers

You're a funny guy.

2006-12-28 18:42:39 · answer #1 · answered by Voodoid 7 · 1 0

of course it is! if you clone a cow, you still have a living, breathing animal which must be slaughtered for your consumption. meat, by its very nature, is from a beast, just as fowl and fish are from fowl and fish. there's no escaping the fact that dolly the sheep was a living, breathing animal who felt pain, just as cloned humans would. the quality of a cloned human mind may be up for grabs but from a strict physical standpoint, it is alive and feels pain and bleeds. some people say fish don't feel anything but i don't believe that, either. they don't look too happy gasping for air while they're dying on the floor of someone's canoe or in the hold of a fishing trawler. if you have any heart, you must realize animals have feelings, too (and that includes the feathered and finned varieties, as well). so, it's either give it up or not, depending on your conscience. i don't like the thought of something having to die because i wanted to eat it. visit a slaughterhouse sometime and see how you feel after that day trip.

hope this is of some use to you.

puffnagel :-)

2006-12-28 16:45:38 · answer #2 · answered by puffnagel 1 · 1 0

for sure that is! in case you clone a cow, you nonetheless have a residing, respiration animal which should be slaughtered on your intake. meat, with the help of its very nature, is from a beast, basically as fowl and fish are from fowl and fish. there is not any escaping the actual incontrovertible truth that dolly the sheep replaced right into a residing, respiration animal who felt soreness, basically as cloned people would. the favourite of a cloned human options would nicely be up for grabs yet from a strict actual factor of view, that is alive and feels soreness and bleeds. some human beings say fish don't experience some thing yet i do not trust that, both. they don't seem too satisfied gasping for air at the same time as they are death on the floor of a persons' canoe or interior the carry of a fishing trawler. once you've any heart, you need to comprehend animals have thoughts, too (and that incorporates the feathered and finned sorts, besides). so, that's both supply it up or not, counting on your moral experience. i don't love the seen some thing having to die because i wanted to devour it. visit a slaughterhouse sometime and word the way you experience after that holiday. desire that is of a few use to you. puffnagel :-)

2016-12-01 07:06:51 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The cell to clone the meat would have to come from an animal that died of natural causes.

2006-12-28 16:35:18 · answer #4 · answered by Nat R 2 · 0 0

Cloned "meat" comes from animals that have been cloned, then raised and killed in the same conditions as regularly bred food animals are. It's kind of sick if you ask me, and I wonder why people are even trying this as it has to be more expensive than simply letting the animals be animals and do their thing.

2006-12-28 16:36:20 · answer #5 · answered by Cat Loves Her Sabres 6 · 2 1

cloning isn't like you grow a slab of meat without the rest of the animal. Of course, you would be killing a living creature to eat it, whether it was cloned or naturally bred.

2006-12-28 16:35:19 · answer #6 · answered by Clycs 4 · 2 0

It depends. They are going to be cloning cows for steak and the clones are just like real cows, they feel pain and all that. If you are talking about growing chicken breasts in a lab, well that's a little weird, and honestly it'd be a lot less weird to just be a vegetarian. Honestly if I wasn't already one I'd become one now since that's going to be normal soon.

2006-12-28 18:02:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

the ethical dilemma you solve with the cloned meat merely bring up the new ethical dilemmas that cloning has, and I'd rather put up with the vegans bitching about killing animals, than the fundamentalist zealots over killing unborn things.

you'd basically replace PETA with Pro-lifers.

2006-12-28 16:39:08 · answer #8 · answered by mezizany 3 · 0 0

Ive never heard of cloned meat without the animal are you sure about this


G

2006-12-28 16:37:03 · answer #9 · answered by nicname 5 · 0 0

Ethical and moral ? That's for the liberals to decide. My opinion on the subject is that its wonderful. Could be a great way to alleviate hunger in the world. Not to mention it could help facilitate space exploration. Oh and now the vegetarians can find out why we kill so many furry animals.

2006-12-28 16:49:15 · answer #10 · answered by felixtricks 3 · 0 1

Uhmm, I am guessing you just read about the FDA approving cloned meat. They are cloning animals and butchering them, not cloning t-bones by themselves. So it still comes down to your animals are food or not sorta question.

2006-12-28 16:35:35 · answer #11 · answered by Brian 3 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers