Name one impeachable offense that was commited by our great president. - truth is you can not name one thing.?

Question

I mean name one illigal thing and site the law that was broken. Please site the law reference number if you can.
I would love to hear of ONE SINGLE impeachable offense -- just one.

I know you die-hard LIbs are just foaming at the mouth. But you are just naming things that were done, might not be proper but is it IMPEACHABLE-- answer is no. Because if it was YES the Democrats would have a field day.

Answer 1

1. Bush lied to Congress and the American public about the reasons for invading Iraq.
2. Bush conducted illegal wiretaps of American citizens.
3. Bush violated International Law by invading a sovereign country for illegal purposes.
4. Bush violated the Geneva Convention by torturing prisoners of war.
5. Bush held prisoners without formal charges and without legal representation. [1]
6. Bush used government funds for domestic political propaganda. [NYT] [2]
7. The Bush team used uniformed military personnel for Republican party political purposes. [1] [2]
8. Bush was negligent in his slow response to help victims of Hurricane Katrina.
9. Bush shows contempt towards our Constitution and our democratic ideals.

Answer 2

Extending government privilege previous the scope of the present constitutional regulation is an impeachable offense. Willfully mendacity to the yank public repeatedly approximately healthcare reform (extremely obtainable the backside subject possible) is an impeachable offense. picking to no longer enforce latest immigration rules for political benefit is an impeachable offense. in case you seem on the sum entire of all the different scandals that got here approximately for the time of his administration, it is especially uncomplicated back up with motives to question, yet that would merely incite added rioting. you notice, we live in an "ends justify the flexibility" society the place suitable and incorrect propose little whilst in comparison with political correctness. If President Obama became white and his schedule distinctive, there could be relentless tension from the media to question. however the mainstream media completely endorses the Obama schedule, so little if something damaging is reported related to this administration. surely, if Jonathan Gruber have been working for the Republican occasion and a Republican President lied as blatantly to the yank human beings approximately some thing as deeply very own as healthcare, how long do you think of he could be in place of work?

Answer 3

Good question.
I hope you don't think for a single minute that the nut balls who have this apparent, demented hatred for our president will be swayed by the fact that there are no valid or verifiable facts to justify an impeachment proceeding.

The "Bush lied" rhetoric can easily be extended to include both houses of congress who voted for the war - they had the same intelligence Bush had.
As far as the personal freedom arguments, I've seen several questions on this forum asking people what rights they have had violated - with no reasonable answers forthcoming.

Most of what he is vilified for, any reasonable person can see that the objective is to try and prevent another terror attack on our soil.

I, for one, am damned glad we didn't have a Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton in office on 9/11!

Answer 4

These libs can list all of the "impeachable offenses" they want to. But the fact is if they were accurate charges of impeachable offenses the loony left would have impeached him a long time ago. The truth is, they are words, that's it. No real charges have been made or proven. God are we in trouble if a lefty is elected in 2008!

Answer 5

I was going to give the answer, but gabound75, already stated the official reasons. Sorry neo-cons, case closed!

Answer 6

By Bush there are no impeachable offenses. For example, he didn't lie about going to war in Iraq any more than the democrats, most nations and even Saddam's army generals who all thought Iraq possessed WMD's. Congress voted for action against Iraq and the UN security council voted 18 resolutions against Iraq for possessing WMD. So ALL lied .........huh?
But on the other hand, Clinton committed purgery in the Paula Jones sex case and that is why he WAS impeached.
Bush will never be impeached and history will favor our president for the tough choices that he made. President Ford was unpopular at the time that he pardoned Nixon, but history has shown favor on Ford because he did this in the best interests of healing the country and in the end he was proved right. In 10 to 20 years, Bush will be seen as doing what was right for the nation at the time. .....

Answer 7

There is not one. He went to war with the approval of Congress. He has not stolen anything. He has not lied under oath. Unlike Slick Willie, who had charges piled up against him a mile high. Libs are still pissed about Slick Willie getting impeach and in retrospect it was a bad idea. We should have known he was not a decent man and would not resign, but it was still a bad idea. Anyhow, no there is nothing on Bush-tough libs-not a damn piece of evidence against.
PS-to all libs-Hate Bush is not enough to impeach him.

Answer 8

How about abuse of power? That is an impeachable offense. So, yeah, I can name one.

Or how about failure to uphold the Constitution of the United States?

What about authorizing the holding of U.S. citizens in violation of of Amendment VI?

To all those that say we just want Bush impeached because we hate Bush, if you actually READ the Constitution, you will see just how many articles he has broken and how he has failed to carry out his sworn duties. If you actually read the posts, you will see that we have loads of facts to back up our claims. So what if Clinton lied about getting a ******* in the White House. A lot of Presidents have had mistresses. What Bush has done has gone above and beyond what Clinton did. Just let it go...

Answer 9

How about revealing the identity of a CIA agent. Clear violation of the National Security Act.

Doing so in a time of war = treason.

Answer 10

To impeach isn't to pull him out of office necessarily. Just to bring him up against a tribunal.

Frankly the fact that he authorized wiretapping on civilians without the judicial branch's approval is alone a monumental constitutional law and check & balance broken.

Answer 11

as far as I know... only one person can answer your question...

and I don't know what he would say...

he is probably telling someone though...

his name is Jack Abramoff...

and he could take down a TON of people on both sides... but it's a bit like a game of Russian roulette... depends on what he says about who and who did what...