English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

It is midevil and barbaric. It is a way for the Government to show the people that they are a powerful entity and will harshly judge down upon those who err the system. I think it is more of a media puppet to keep people scared or in suport of 'their governments decision', then it does good for societys sake as a whole.

2006-12-28 14:54:52 · answer #1 · answered by Tropicalboy 3 · 5 1

I've watched the trial of Saddam, it has been a rigged trial from the very beginning. I think Life in Prison would be a more fitting sentence for Saddam.

Once he's hung, his misery will be over. He'll be a Martyr, and all hell is going to break loose in Iraq if he's executed.

The only way i'd support Saddam's execution is if they took George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powell, and everyone else that supported this illegal war and hung them all together side by side.

2006-12-29 07:25:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

some pretty sorry, and not very well thought out answers to your question the implications are the fact that he will be considered a martyr by his followers, and by people who it serves their purpose, will be held up as a religious figure to follow, in their attempt to kill more Americans.
their misguided thought will be solidified in their minds, and their hatred for everyone else given justification in their own minds.
not many people on these boards must follow history all that well, or they would realize a man's message is more powerful in death than it every was during his life. that is the way of the world, that is reality.
want proof? look at any religious figure!
which is exactly what he'll be if he is executed soon. Saddam will be Islam's Patron saint of Endless war!

2006-12-28 23:35:44 · answer #3 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 3 1

This will be "business as usual" for the Bush family in Iraq, and something for all Iraqis to watch. Capital Punishment is a blight on civilization. For us to encourage people to see yet another example that our policy is "violence is good," and that we stand for nothing noble is proof to those that oppose what is going on in Iraq should increase their opposition. Our invasion was contrary to international law and ethics. Bush Sr. supported, armed and trained the Bath party and its leader Saddam, supported him when he oppressed his people and then when he attacked Iran. Then in the first Gulf War, Bush Sr. encouraged the Kurds and Shiites to rise up and fight him, only to sit back and watch as Saddam crushed those who did so. To now go in, throw him out, bomb those that oppose our new choice for who should run Iraq, and then hang Saddam for all to see, is an act of such moral bankruptcy as to inspire the most apathetic fence sitter to join in the battle against us. Is it possible that there is anyone left in Iraq who still believes anything we say? How is it that Americans are allowing BushCo to completely destroy our reputation in Iraq, the world and our soul as well? Is this really what we want the world to believe America stands for? It disgraces all those who paid such a high price for our country to be a beacon of hope, freedom, and honor for the world.

2006-12-29 02:17:32 · answer #4 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 1 0

The puppets try to execute a fearless person out of fear for their own puppet career.

2006-12-28 23:06:14 · answer #5 · answered by isin5o 2 · 1 1

1) It's not a puppet govt.
2) There aren't that many implications. A brutal tyrant will be executed. end of story.

2006-12-28 23:00:11 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3 3

What implications are you babbling about? A semi-legitimate government has run its justice system against the previous dipstick in power, and now they're going to hang him. They're supposed to be a sovereign country already, dammit.

2006-12-28 22:48:58 · answer #7 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 2 2

Are we looking for a pat on the back for a job well done?

He's been doing this for 24 years, what took us so long?

2006-12-28 23:19:58 · answer #8 · answered by government slave 2 · 1 1

The implications are no more deadly than the implications of our 9/11 false flag attack and using it to commit genocide on the Muslims.

2006-12-28 22:53:15 · answer #9 · answered by protocols 2 · 4 4

I understand that might comes from the barrel of a gun. And the implications are this: He will be dancing Danny Deaver soon. One less towel head. Send people like you over to Mecca to hum some $hit with those camel humps.

2006-12-28 22:50:53 · answer #10 · answered by Jimfix 5 · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers