we've spent billions on this war when we could have been spending it on ending our dependence on foreign oil and the funding of terrorist organizations.
2006-12-28 13:00:07 · 4 answers · asked by Enigma 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Comp U: that would make the US the driver of terrorism wouldn't it. So as I stated we could put a big dent in the terrorists economy.
2006-12-28 13:26:25 · update #1
Yes that's true, but it won't leave as much money as will leave with the people behind the interests like the one the Bush family has. We have a lot of petroleum, but the government prefer to use the one from the middle east, this is necessary to keep the bonds among these big industries.
2006-12-28 13:05:13 · answer #1 · answered by Javy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't quite understand the question.
Do you mean our dependence on foreign oil is funding terrorist organizations, and if we pull back of this dependence, it would reduce the numbers in these organizations.
Wait, who then is the driver of terrorism then ?
2006-12-28 21:16:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The government should be working harder to solve the problem with global warming, cause this is the first winter in my life I haven't seen snow in December.
2006-12-28 21:08:22 · answer #3 · answered by Maus 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not when they make so much money on oil.
2006-12-28 21:02:31 · answer #4 · answered by Bobby! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋