English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

For cost, best color definition CRT is far and away the better choice.

For brightness, light weight, and coolness - LCD is the best choice.

The fundamental advantage of the CRT is that it is extremely well established technology - and since its in decline - you can purchase a remarkable piece of equipment for a very small sum o' cash.

LCD (and Plasma) are both well into achieving dominance in the market, but remain pricey - and they still do not render color as accurately as the old CRT's do.

Given a bit o' time - they'll equal (at least in theory) the color quality of the CRT.

-dh

2006-12-28 13:01:30 · answer #1 · answered by delicateharmony 5 · 0 1

LCD monitors are flat screen which is certainly better but are more expensive than CRT (cathode ray tube) monitors.

Unless you really need a flat screen consider sticking with a CRT to keep the price down.

2006-12-28 20:58:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You gotta go LCD. LCD takes less space, uses less electricity, is sharper, gives you a larger screen size, and is way easier on the eyes.

CRT is outdated technology, so with a LCD.

2006-12-28 20:57:59 · answer #3 · answered by Tyler H 3 · 0 0

I personally like CRTs for their viewing angle, but wait a few years and get an LED for the best choice!

2006-12-28 20:57:04 · answer #4 · answered by thdweb 2 · 0 1

LCD all the way.

2006-12-28 20:56:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers