what's your thoughts?
2006-12-28 12:06:41 · 4 answers · asked by Chaoticfreedoms 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Unfortunately it is part of the plan. The institution of a New World Order police state will probably not be possible without another staged catastrophic event, and the subsequent declaration of martial law. The time is very likely drawing near. We need to prepare for the worst.
2006-12-28 12:16:51 · answer #1 · answered by oceansoflight777 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Generally speaking, martial law is bad, since it gives inordinate power to the military in general, and to individual soldiers in particular. It negates such basic rights as the right to trial and the assumption of innocence.
On the other hand, extreme circumstances require extreme answers. New Orleans after Katrina was in a state of anarchy, and only the imposition of martial law enabled the city to get back to a semblance of civility.
2006-12-28 20:18:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You talking bout the possibility here in the U.S.?
Just exactly where would you classify the "protest zones" created by Bush wherever he decides to sputter at the mouth under our constitution?
Kellogg Brown and Root aren't building massive detention centers in secret locations in the United States to herd up the mulslims like we did the Japenese during WWII, but they are being built as some kind of forethought.
http://www.alternet.org/rights/42458/
http://www.unknownnews.org/060203a-Hennessy.html
Please tell me these facilities are being built to solve the illegal immigrant problem and to not house we Americans through some sort of act of Sedition!!
2006-12-28 20:22:03 · answer #3 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gee.. could you make your question any more generic? There isn't enough to answer.
2006-12-28 21:14:06 · answer #4 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋