hanging is too cheap for him, isnt it ??
2006-12-28 11:48:36 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I agree. I think he should go thru about 30 days of solid sadistic torture (starvation, cut off one finger at a time, castration, disembowelment, removal of limbs, dental surgery with NO anesthesia, sh*t like that) and then after the 30 days, shoot him - firing squad where all guns are aimed first at his gut, then his groin, then his face.
2006-12-28 11:53:13 · answer #1 · answered by Rotten Johnny 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In his country being shot by a firing squad is considered an honer only given to those that served in the Iraq Military. He has NOT earned that death he was never in the military, that's why it was refused when he asked for it originally
2006-12-28 11:51:23 · answer #2 · answered by Sluttythenun 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually lets put him in a jail cell with a big black man and let him get rapped repeatedly for a few months then make him work as a greeter at Walmart for the rest of his miserable life.
2006-12-28 11:56:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No Hanging him is what the sod's going to get, better way is to turn him lose in the square where is statue used stand and let the Iraqi people have him.
2006-12-28 11:53:30 · answer #4 · answered by Jim Ignatowski 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
depends if you want to be merciful. I would rather be shot by a firing squad than hanged.
2006-12-28 11:51:42 · answer #5 · answered by Bre 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Given the cutting-edge months events and the "inner" Iraqi mindset/conflict among they selves, I say; that throughout the previous you place any execution date; Saddam would desire to be enable "loose" upon those cowards whom are killing each and each others women, the old, the harmless, and their infants. human beings like those in basic terms comprehend one element; and that's Saddam. All this romanticism approximately given them their "freedom" on the fee of the lives of our youthful females and adult males contained in the service and ; !!!which "freedom" they have used to "kill and ambush" US and coalition forces must be accomplished away with. Edit: I edited the 0.33 line from the backside, so all the bleeding hearts right here substances me some greater, or ; all the "thumbs down" they could like. fact all hurts ; does not it?
2016-12-18 20:50:05 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First I'd put him in charge of the Iraq war w. real WMD's, that's what he was accussed of having, who really had them? Then I'd let the leaders of both sides hang each other in fairness.
2006-12-28 11:55:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They will do nothing. He'll end up in France, Spain or Germany living like a king in exile with a billion Dollars!
2006-12-28 11:56:29 · answer #8 · answered by BlackRose for ssirren! 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hmmmm. Let's see. There were no weapons, he had nothing to do with 911 and all he did was continue killing his people like he had for decades. We always ignored it before and now all of a sudden we care?...what was the factor that changed all this? No one really cares about the answer to this question
2006-12-28 11:55:50 · answer #9 · answered by westgaliberty 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
THE BEST PUNISHMENT WOULD BE.........
LASH HIM UNTIL HE HAS OPEN SORES, SMEAR HONEY ALL OVER HIM, DUMP IN A FEW THOUSAND FIRE ANTS FOR GOOD MEASURE. THEN TIE HIM TO A STUMP IN A LOUISIANA SWAMP, LET THE GATORS DO THE REST.
AS LONG AS YOU ARE GUILTY WITHOUT REASONABLE DOUBT.....CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IS NOT TO GOOD FOR YOU......AND THAT GOES DOUBLE AND DE-BALL'EM FOR CONVICTED CHILD MOLESTERS, WHY PAY TAX MONEY & UPKEEP TO JAILS, WHEN IT IS NOT NECESSARY
2006-12-28 11:51:25 · answer #10 · answered by bex920 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋