Please tell me also WHY do you think this! Thanks a lot!
2006-12-28 11:37:04 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Mythology & Folklore
Well... I sincerely think that...
1 The Tower of Babel was not a structure built to launch a rocket!
2 The Sun he says is at the centre of his misinterpreted Sumerian solar system is not the Sun but ... another Star !
3 His Biblical translations are just pure fantasy! Basic grammar rules are not used!
4 In ancient mythology snakes or dragons usually represented the CHAOS before any Creation and not the extremely organised human DNA!
Conclusion:
...blind faith is the only thing required to look forward ... Nibiru.
2006-12-29 10:38:47 · answer #1 · answered by io gi 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I was once at a conference where Zecharia Sitchin should have done a talk. I was looking forward to it after reading, the Twelfth planet. Unfortunately he was to poorly to attend. The gentleman who did it for him, really was too nervous so the speech wasn't as 'effective' as it could have been.
Whilst I am lost on the Nephilim part of his beliefs, I do think that it is highly probable (has it been proved yet) about the planet that is in our solar system and only comes around once every so many thousand years.
At the speech, they pointedly made out that the snake was represented and they thought this stood for the DNA - it made sense at the time!
ps if no more answers come in, could you give me the ten points for trying? ;-)
2006-12-28 11:44:33 · answer #2 · answered by Agony Aunt 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not a lot, lots of people have theorized about the universe and planets and some of this has been proven to be true just as some of Sitchins, this does not proof that the dribble he wrote is true especially when he tries to prove that events that probably never even happened were caused by non existant gods this man is just one of the thousands of deluded religious maniacs around who should really be in a lunatic asylum but as he lives in America this will not happen as its leader Bush hears god speaking to him and yet he is still called a great leader by the lunatics in America.
2006-12-29 05:50:43 · answer #3 · answered by Stephen P 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I know little of his work , other than to be wary of Alien interference theories. As with all of this type of research ( there have been many others, don`t imagine Sitchin is original) none of the `evidence` every amounts to anything. This type of speculation has been going on for many years, and not one of any of the many crazy theories has been accepted by everyday Science. You would imagine that such ground breaking research would last at least until the next book is published, which is the only certainty to come from this approach to science.
2006-12-28 11:55:24 · answer #4 · answered by ED SNOW 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he is brilliant! I love his book, The Twelfth Planet. I did so much research and I agree with almost everything he has written. However, the DNA thing really makes sense to me. It is the leap in evolution the scientists are looking for. I think if they actually believed a little of the old myths, they might be able to answer their questions.
2006-12-28 16:00:53 · answer #5 · answered by Lady Aqua Moon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is very interesting and highly probable. It certainly hasn't been proven yet.....as far as I know, but it makes a great deal more sense to me than the conventional interpretation of the bible, and so I tend to believe it...for the most part.
2006-12-28 11:51:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sitchens works are based on extremly antient Mesopotamian texts which are in turn based on even older myths and ledgends so i would be careful of accepting them at face value. (en-ki wasnt quite the decent chap he makes out in the books!)
2006-12-31 12:01:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think it is very interesting and highly probably
2006-12-28 11:55:40 · answer #8 · answered by STORMY K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋