2006-12-28 10:55:49 · 13 answers · asked by I love Israel 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
in Israel, but not here, not yet.
2006-12-28 11:02:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
As i've got reported in this board before, Obama isn't a liberal, yet a neocon in liberal gowns. He sounds greater like Bush Lite to me. Care to guess how lots American family members and distant places coverage does not substitute after Inauguration Day January 2009? an analogous factor could ensue with John McCain. the only difference is that he won't say something before approximately setting up such an employer. he will in simple terms set it up. regardless of it means it does not sound good to me. word how he says, "we can not proceed to recollect in basic terms on our protection rigidity so as to realize the national protection aims that we've set." This sounds like a countrywide inner protection rigidity with policing powers to maintain the inhabitants so as. of path this could be a covert employer with hundreds of informers. If one has a grudge against somebody, then you could actually tell the government approximately that individual's "behaviour." what's thrilling is what organizational and operational platforms would be taken from the Soviet KGB and the Gestapo. little question, this is a huge step in direction of a totalitarian society.
2016-10-06 03:31:29 · answer #2 · answered by boland 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends where they are and what they are doing or have done or are planning to do. When you say civilians, I am hoping you are talking about folks who are actively working to kill you or attack your country or its interests and not some shmuck running a laundry or a woman hanging out her laundry or some kids playing football.
2006-12-28 11:00:50 · answer #3 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If those people are threatening the security of a country, that country has not only the right but the duty to protect its citizens using whatever means are necessary.
2006-12-28 11:44:11 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Are those civilians innocent bystanders? Are those civilians in a war zone? Certainly, if they are not hostile and they are not in a war zone, then of course we shouldn't kill them. Are they in a war zone, then the correct policy is to avoid killing them while still waging war against the enemy. If they are hostile, then yes, they are legitimate targets.
2006-12-28 11:04:31 · answer #5 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Depends on the situation.
2006-12-28 11:00:44 · answer #6 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
it's not a yes/no question, depends on the circumstances
2006-12-28 10:57:56 · answer #7 · answered by Nick F 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-12-28 11:00:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yes, if it is US that is doing it. No, if it is any other country doing it. At least, that is what is happening and that is what we are seeing.
2006-12-28 11:01:36 · answer #9 · answered by ramshi 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
It's called "Warfare."
2006-12-28 11:01:30 · answer #10 · answered by Doc 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
YES
2006-12-28 11:03:14 · answer #11 · answered by Sicko 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋