What would the single BEST POSSIBLE solution to global warming HAVE to have as adjectives describing it?

Question

What I mean is, it would of course have to be as cheap as possible, effective as possible, etc...

I believe human kind, collectively, is so powerful that we can counteract any inadvertent temperture change we create and even if the earth is naturally prone to periods of warming and cooling we could stop it from happening if we really decided to, and regulate the atomospheres tempature to what we determine to be enviromentally ideal, all while doing it in an affordible way in terms of money and resources. History is chock full of people doing things, that, before acomplished, almost everyone said and really believed were impossible.

I believe that if we attempt to fully describe what the best possible solution would look like as accurately as we can then it will present itself automatically.

I believe that if we attempt to fully describe what the best possible solution would look like as accurately as we can then it will present itself automatically.

Answer 1

Solution? The "solution" is hideously simple, yet imposable. We'd need to address the only known causes. That being the big fire that is burning on the sun. The forest's of this planet put out tons more CFC's per year than the output of CFC's from say...all mankind in history. So kill the trees too. Oh yeah, and the sea is full of microbes that are aerobic and therefore contribute millions of tons of carbon dioxide per day. So, I say we need to kill the ocean too. Really though if you feel that bad about how wrong and rotten and evil you are for being human, turn off your PC, stop paying for gas, electricity, give your ride away, and try not to breathe too much as this also gives off nasty greenhouse gasses.

Answer 2

A simple solution to global warming is to reduce the humidity in the air. People are way too caught up with CO2. Water is 18x more of a warmer than CO2. When I say simple, I don't mean that there is a simple way to do that, but reducing the average humidity by 5% would have a whamo effect on global warming. While putting in all of the CO2 reductions in the Kyoto Protocol has been estimated by many scientifics to have a near 0 effect on average temps.

Answer 3

Periodic:
having cyclic or regular periods, a routine

The Earth goes through this Global warming thing often. The last time it happened was only about 10,000 years ago, and it was called the end of the freaking ICE AGE!!!

There is no such thing as global warming!!! It's a periodic cycle or warming, cooling, warming, cooling, warming, cooling, warming, cooling...

I think somebody has been watching too many Al Gore fictional movies (like your teacher who is spewing this trash using my tax dollars...)

A perfect example of a small scale warming/cooling is the periodic hurricane intensity changes that occur over about a 25-30 year cycle. We happen to be on an upswing of hurricane intensity and activity lately. The last time this happened was in the 30's- 40's.

Answer 4

Not sure what precisely you are asking, but as many scientific and engineering endeavours, almost all possible proposed solutions involve some kind of trade-off, and it is not really possible to say with certainty which one is the best. But the best adjective I can think of is SUSTAINABLE. That, at least, I think, summarises up a lot of what people are striving for and is a key goal of modern economic/industrial development.

Answer 5

i think of the 1st subject that would desire to alter is our potential source. If government investment became faraway from oil companies and given to determination potential companies, the U.S. might desire to get 40% of it is electrical energy from wind potential on my own. i think there must be extra strict emissions standards for vehicles, or change to hydrogen or electric vehicles. suitable now it relatively is ineffective to alter to electric or hydrogen vehicles because of the fact the electrical powered energy and hydrogen comes from the burning of fossil fuels. it relatively is confusing to apply image voltaic potential, considering the fact which you like such an vast style of panels to get a respectable quantity of potential, it is why image voltaic panels must be placed on person homes, instead of image voltaic potential plant life. the potential companies might desire to very own the panels and value the place of abode for use. this might make it much less stressful for voters who can not arise with the money for to purchase a image voltaic panel to very own them. I additionally think of that persons ought to start a self imposed cut back on the beginning of latest childern so as that we are able to quit the exponentially increasing inhabitants. we would desire to continually objective to slowly cut back the inhabitants over various many years so as that our financial gadget isn't harm with the aid of a unexpected drop interior the style of toddlers.

Answer 6

CO2 Negative, would be the most important adjective....of course..

Namaste, and Happy New Year,

--Tom

Answer 7

I vote we stop selling any materials that can be used to make cars to the Indians or Chinese. Make them stay on their bikes.