With only 32 bowl games, only the very finest 64 division IA college football teams get to go to bowl games. Isn't this unfair to the rest? Even crappy teams work hard and practice all season, and missing bowl season must be tough on their self esteem. Shouldn't we have a bowl for everyone? (And give big trophies to the losers too?)
2006-12-28 09:31:55 · 15 answers · asked by KevinStud99 6 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
NO a thousand times NO. Oh how politically correct this is !!!YUCK. There are good teams and there are BAD teams.Losers do not deserve trophies. What an idiot. Do you have have a little pride in your crappy team. Live in the real world.
2006-12-28 09:53:18 · answer #1 · answered by al 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bowl games are intended to be an award for a good season. In my opinion there are really too many bowl games. I feel a team should have 7 wins to qualify for a bowl.
2006-12-28 17:48:54 · answer #2 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Aren't there too many bowls to begin with. Why does Miami, FSU, Iowa, or Minnesota deserve to play a bowl game? You earn the right to play in the postseason by doing well in the regular season. The whole bowl system is a load of crap anyway.
2006-12-28 18:12:57 · answer #3 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell no!!!! of course every team works hard but that's football...it's hard work but it's fun! i mean my team went 0-7 but yet we had a blast the entire time. these guyz choice to play and i'm sure most of them played in high school so they no what it's like to lose, and that's life you no even though you work hard doesn't mean you play in bowl games you have your season to strut your stuff and if you're good enough you'll make it if not you don't make it...idk what else 2 say bout it...o and in my book u gotta win 2 get a big trophy.
2006-12-28 18:46:03 · answer #4 · answered by lawnboy525 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bowl games started out as privately sponsored events with the intent to make money. Not withstanding the NCCA's control over participation in bowl games, they remain private, for-profit enterprises. Sponsors of bowl games want teams that will attract a paying audience. Who, in their right mind, would attempt to sponsor a game between sub-par teams that no one would pay to watch play?
2006-12-28 17:46:46 · answer #5 · answered by Xeod 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because some teams like duke havent won ne games all year other teams like duke for 2-4 years hadnt won at all thats an 0-24 to 0-48 record thats y
2006-12-28 18:42:20 · answer #6 · answered by yomamma 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no! caz if theres a team that sucks like duke or yale or harvard or stanford they shouldent have the chance to go 2 a bowl game. u atleast gotta have a winning season..but i do think there should be like playoffs for EVERY team!!!
2006-12-28 17:37:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only way to pull that off would be to make every teams regular season shorter.
2006-12-28 17:41:03 · answer #8 · answered by BionicNahlege 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
soon in this country of "political correctness" every team will play in a bowl game
2006-12-28 17:36:12 · answer #9 · answered by nas88car300 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yup every team should to make it fair or they will go nuts like the red sox fans when bostn won the world series in '04
2006-12-28 17:35:02 · answer #10 · answered by MarcAlphonse S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋