2006-12-28 09:23:31 · 26 answers · asked by ebillar 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Take it on good authority that Harry is the product of Charles and Diana. Case closed!
2006-12-28 17:40:45 · answer #1 · answered by *Happy Once Again!* 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You're all answering 'No' as if you actually have the documentation in front of you.
How can any of you possibly know? You're not privy to the DNA results, and it seems likely she was actually involved with James Hewitt before she said she was on that panorama documentary. Which was cleverly orchestrated by her good self to obtain maximum sympathy anyway. She's hardly going to admit that she was being as unfaithful as she was accusing hubby of being. Not if she wanted a good divorce settlement.
I think Harry does look like James Hewitt, but then there's none so blind as those that don't want to see
And it's hilarious that some of you think Harry comes on yahoo answers at all, let alone on New years eve.
2006-12-30 13:03:48 · answer #2 · answered by Eden* 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
After losing his beloved mother, Harry must love reading this nonsense that his Father might not be his Father. DNA test the Prince and get it over with! You'll find out that he's truly a Royal.
2006-12-29 07:24:43 · answer #3 · answered by Debra D 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way. Have you looked that boy squarely in the face? He looks like Charles popped that bun out of the oven right by himself. William thank goodness got Mum's looks and grace. Now I might find it a bit easier to believe that William is a product of Diana and a handsome man. But poor little Harry has "daddy" written all over him.
2006-12-28 17:30:13 · answer #4 · answered by Only hell mama ever raised 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
She didn't start having lovers until 2yrs after he was born,so i don't think so!
Prince Harry however looks more like the Windsors than William does,and apparently has more of his mothers nature.William on the other hand may look like his mother,but is very much his fathers son.
2006-12-31 14:43:05 · answer #5 · answered by Countess 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he is Charles son and there is much foundation that he isnt , why wouldnt the Royals publish the D.N.A?
It is VERY significant that the truth be known as Harry is in the line of cuccession, if you are going to have a system based on heridity there should be no stone left unturned to prove his right to that POST.
Some time ago a newspaper man got some of Harry,s hair and was going to have D.N.A done, the Royals went spare and put a stop to it.
2006-12-28 23:49:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
William looked a lot like Diana when he was young but is looking more and more like Charles as the years pass.
Harry is not unattractive. He looked more like Charles but is starting to look more like Diana.
2006-12-29 16:35:59 · answer #7 · answered by Bleaarg 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Give it a rest...
For those of you who are answering such as angelikabertrand64 is, I hope you have plenty of money to fight any lawsuits that Prince Harry may wish to land you with for these accusations against him. There is no proof whatsoever that he is Hewitt's son, and by saying, in writing, that he is his biological son you are committing libel...
So the lad has red hair...so does my cousin but her sister doesn't, and both their parents had dark hair....as with the Spencers, there happened to be red hair in other parts of the family....my mother for one!
It's called genetics...so accept it and leave Prince Harry alone as he must surely be aware of these ridiculous accusations against his parentage...how would you feel if it was you that the rumours were about!
2006-12-29 05:44:58 · answer #8 · answered by sarch_uk 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Diana said she started her affairs after Harry was born. I really think he does belong to Charles.
2006-12-29 00:45:17 · answer #9 · answered by Sandy Lou 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
There was a story that Princess Anne's daughter wasn't fathered by her husband. She called the guard that she was supposedly having an affair with on the day the daughter was born. I'm betting Harry isn't Charles. To me, the red hair and the features, he looks like Hewett. But, be that as it may, they are still the richest welfare recipients in the whole world.
2006-12-28 19:37:08 · answer #10 · answered by JoAnn W 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋