2006-12-28 05:54:02 · 11 answers · asked by Sean 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I've been saying that all along. Maybe it would mellow-out him and dead-eye Dick.
I'd rather have a man in the oval office that knows what a BJ is than a redneck who's slammin' it to all of us.
2006-12-28 06:57:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
who's to say Bush didn't get as much "action" as Clinton. Remember, information on Clinton's "action" came after a 5 year , 30+ million dollar investigation into whitewater. Perhaps if Bush was investigated as thoroughly, we just might find out a little more about the man.
2006-12-28 06:00:46 · answer #2 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm not trying to be funny, but do you mean: action on the homefront, action on the warfront or Bushonica reborn? I think he has support on the first two fronts and always has. I think if he did something equivalent to what Clinton did with Monica L. (I can't spell her last name, sorry), Laura Bush would leave him regardless what was at stake regarding reputation etal. She strikes me as that type of person.
2006-12-28 06:00:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Clinton had so much loving action he did not have time to make chaos and mayhem.... besides Hillary was to preoccupied getting botox and lipo to implant any intelligent idea in the charismatic Bill!
2006-12-28 06:01:18 · answer #4 · answered by 2u-sister 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are assuming he is not getting any action maybe he actually loves his wife and she is giving him all he can handle.
The better question should be if Clinton was getting any action from Hillary (which I doubt) maybe he would not be scoping for chicks.
2006-12-28 06:02:22 · answer #5 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely! I think ALL our public leaders should use the women in their employ as sexual playthings, and then work overtime to fix a court case to get out of it.
As long as they are a Democrat and "pro-feminist."
(sarcasm)
PS Thumbs down? What part of this did I miss? Sexual harrasment is a good thing now? Do we need to apologize to Clarence Thomas for making his video rentals public - wasn't that a "private matter?" Or is it that perjury and obstruction of justice are OK? What did Nixon resign over? (Hint: obstruction of justice! The "smoking gun" tape! August 5, 1974. I was alive thIen, and I remember; it was in all the papers!)
2006-12-28 06:03:52 · answer #6 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
His issue is incompetence concerning major issues, not sexual frustration.
2006-12-28 07:12:45 · answer #7 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. His failures stem from his intellectual incapacity for the job, and his delegating responsibility to ideologues rather than pragmatists.
2006-12-28 05:57:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
I HEARD HE'S HITTING HILLARY ON THE SIDE.
2006-12-28 06:00:20 · answer #9 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ask his wife.
2006-12-28 05:57:28 · answer #10 · answered by Preacher 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋