English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

No, but his supporters probably will.

2006-12-28 05:53:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

I'm sorry, but in case you aren't aware of this. Our country was already bombed because Clinton didn't do what he was supposed to do the first time the World Trade center got bombed by Bin Laden's followers. The USS Cole was also bombed by Bin Laden's followers during Clinton's presidency and nothing was done. Don't forget about the US Embassy that was bombed by Al Qaida operatives during, yet again, Clinton's presidency, and nothing was done. To be honest, I feel Bush is trying to prevent a WW3 by weakening an enemy that was gaining too much power. If there was a WW3, it would have been the Middle East against the rest of the world.

2006-12-28 13:58:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

great already saying that if a major battle comes out of this its Bushes fault. figures. Did Bush make the radical islamists kill the 3 million Hindus in Kashmir? the 1.5 million Armenian Christians in Turkey? I can give you a list 5 pages long. Limited history is never a good thing to base your opinions on...

2006-12-28 13:54:54 · answer #3 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 2 0

No, which is why I have kept up the pressure to end the war before that happens.

As for 9/11, it would have been good if we had actually concentrated on the country that was assisting Bin Laden and Al Quaeda.

Oh, wait, we did, then Bushwa withdrew most of the support once we were winning to go fight an illegal war in Iraq, so now we are losing in Afghanistan too due to neglect!

That's really snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, eh?

2006-12-28 13:55:10 · answer #4 · answered by Lioness 2 · 0 4

I think that has already happened with 9/11 so don't blame Mr. Bush. We got more bombs and the world is overpopulated. bring them on.

2006-12-28 13:54:12 · answer #5 · answered by Chuck C 4 · 2 0

NO !!! I would much rather we had that limp wrist leg wetting liberal in charge so he could put flowers in the barrels of the AK-47's and hook corsages to the dynamite strapped around their body's...poor guys.... we need to concentrate on important things, like the poops driving their cars causing global warming...

2006-12-28 14:06:03 · answer #6 · answered by Gunny T 6 · 1 0

if I could trade bombing my Homeland for the eradication of all Islamonazis world-wide,then yes, I'd be very,very happy.

2006-12-28 13:55:51 · answer #7 · answered by slabsidebass 5 · 2 0

I'm ready for the end. Head out in the mountains and make raids on the convenient stores. Watch it all be destroyed. There's something special about a city burning.

2006-12-28 13:53:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I believe the towers where attacked not once but twice!!! I also believe a U.S. military ship was attacked! Wake up before it is to late!!!!!!!
We are far from safe.

2006-12-28 13:54:09 · answer #9 · answered by Shaun K 4 · 3 0

bush wasn't the start of the war, how about the terrorists bombing our building was! uhm, yea what were we left to do? just sweep it under the rug?

2006-12-28 13:51:39 · answer #10 · answered by alicia LUVS to dance! 3 · 4 3

NO. The War President really sucks

2006-12-28 13:50:49 · answer #11 · answered by Sean 4 · 2 5

fedest.com, questions and answers