Condoleezza Rice is the current Secretary of State. Henry Kissinger had once been a Secretary of State. Both had served under turbulent times and crisis in world politics. Who do you think is better in handling diplomacy?. Who do you think had a better achievement in dealing with "rogue" nations?.
2006-12-28 05:02:41 · 4 answers · asked by roadwarrior 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The Bush Administration is "The Land of Make Believe" and in that land is Condoleeza playing Sec. of State. Whether you like Kissinger or not, many would have him tried for war crimes at the
Hague, he is an extremely intelligent man, telemering into his nineties, and his counsel has been sought by many since the 50's. Condoleeza is just acting the part, as BushCo has no role for diplomacy in their agenda. Their shoot first and ask questions later style does not need a Sec. of State with any gravitas.
2006-12-28 05:23:44 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Politically? Kissinger...... but then he did the same things that Clinton did & got away with it.
2006-12-28 13:13:24 · answer #2 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Neither one.
2006-12-28 13:05:15 · answer #3 · answered by Preacher 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Kissinger, by a long shot.......................................
2006-12-28 13:10:07 · answer #4 · answered by docie555@yahoo.com 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋