English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it the fact that she is a smart, well spoken woman who doesn't easily back down?

2006-12-28 04:22:51 · 23 answers · asked by Sean 4 in Politics & Government Politics

23 answers

Yes Sean. Also realize that the "right" in general is not very supportive of women in roles as leaders and suffer from the "Stepford Wives" syndrome.

Hillary is an intelligent, AGGRESSIVE woman who has already made a name for herself in politics. This, overall, makes her a threat to a male dominated profession and more of a threat to a republican dominated government (currently).

GBY

2006-12-28 04:30:32 · answer #1 · answered by Dust in the Wind 7 · 7 4

i think of she intimidates them through fact even after 8 years of dedicated study interior the quest for info against her and invoice over each and every form of trumped up rubbish, they got here up with zip. could not even get an indictment. So it infuriates them that she would back be interior the White abode, as President this time. The Clintons have been "rock megastar" common and it made the Republicans seethe with resentment and hatred. not something has replaced curiously. For the subsequent 2 years, we are able to work out outrageous accusations - they have already began. For the main section nonetheless, this is previous crap they have in no way been waiting to tutor, and those individuals sufficiently previous to have experienced that when are going to brush off it this time around for what this is - a pathetic attempt to demonize her. the factor the Republican Hate gadget does not understand is that maximum individuals are directly to them at present. they have had adequate of it, alongside with the conflict - all one has to do is investigate the mid-words to work out that. The socialist factor somewhat cracks me up. Do those human beings even understand what a socialist is? curiously, in case you're a Democrat, you'll be a socialist, this is purely approximately gotten laughable. conventional wellbeing care is the launch pad for those accusations, yet they conveniently ignore approximately that many Republicans in the two properties are very interested in this concept to boot. wager they're socialists too...

2016-12-11 17:38:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Clintons intimidated Richard Mellon Scaife - who funded the attack campaign on them when Bill Clinton was in office. Everthing that followed is just tail wagging from that one big blowout of venom.

2006-12-28 04:31:45 · answer #3 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 2 0

First, I've never seen any proof or indication that she is smart. She's greedy, ambitious and corrupt, and has exibited all these characteristics, but smart? I'll need more proof than the Hillary shills spewing this as a fact.

Second, well spoken? Only if she's running off a script.

As for being "intimidated", we're not. We recognize that she's a corrupt, power-hungry, lying socialist. We're also astounded that any sane person would support such a corrupt politician.

But she'll never win any nationwide election, because of her long history of corruption and abuse of power.

Can you explain why you would embrace such a tainted person like Hillary?

2006-12-28 04:40:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 5

You all can call her all the names in the book but one thing is clear - she has intelligence that George Bush would love to have.
She has a way of working with members of Congress so she is respected and called on for various projects. Hilleary is not a pretty woman but she is a smart woman.
I do not like her really and I do not like George Bush either. I know why I don't like George Bush - he is incompetent, unintelligent and reckless. I don't know why I don't like her. I just don't but I respect her.

2006-12-28 04:52:03 · answer #5 · answered by Lou 6 · 4 1

I don't think Republicans are intimidated by her. I think Republicans know that it will be a disaster if she gets into office. Appeasement for terrorists, sell more secrets to the North Koreans and Chinese, higher taxes, wealth redistibution, a failed national health care system, socialism, dismantling of our military.....should I go on.
And this would all be within the first year.

She used the people of New York to promote her political agenda. Now they are going to have a Senator who does nothing but promote herself for the next two years but collects a salary off their tax dollars.

2006-12-28 04:28:16 · answer #6 · answered by songndance1999 4 · 6 3

The difference between Hillary and "W" is the same as FDR and Hoover in that order. They to realize the difference and would rather the country suffer than see the out standing results with her as leader of the U.S.

2006-12-28 04:37:36 · answer #7 · answered by edubya 5 · 1 3

She is savvy, very intellectually adept and determined to help make America and the world a better place in spite of republican dominated special interests.

2006-12-28 04:33:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

No, don't play the "feminist" card.

My fear of her - and I'll use the word fear - is that she could well become president! I think she would be bad, very bad, for the country. I think she is insincere and too far to the left. and dishonest.

She has many skills, which is what makes her a threat.

2006-12-28 04:27:02 · answer #9 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 5 4

intimidation is the wrong word. see through her BS is the better phrase. she keeps saying moderate moderate but her voting record is so far left its not even on the page. bet you never looked at that but seeing your opinions you probably would be happier with her looking at it.

2006-12-28 04:28:14 · answer #10 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 5 3

fedest.com, questions and answers