English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

ossam and george and oj string em up!

2006-12-28 04:13:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

should anyone be hung? ever?....for every person that hates, disrespects and condemns someone, there is a person that loves, respects and admires them bar none. Every person on this earth, is seen in both lights...good and bad. The taking of a human beings life is not for us to choose. Would you like to have been crusified along side of someone, because you loved them and admired them? I personally don't like Saddam or most of the people I see in the media today but, I sure don't want to see anyone put to death.... horse whipped, publicly humilliated, or caged YES, but taking a life of a caged human is not really an honorable task.

2006-12-28 04:35:50 · answer #2 · answered by twostories 4 · 1 1

In a manner i accept as true with you, yet Osama had not something to do with Iraq, he's a terrorist with training from the yank military. definite he killed harmless human beings yet for something of you analyzing this didnt George Bush's strike on nigeria kill many harmless human beings this week? what with reference to the masses of harmless people who're being killed in Iraq? infants ,women human beings elderly human beings? all by using the yank military. The celebrations that supposedly occurred whilst he replaced into captured have been fixed by using grant of foodstuff and money to civilians, the celebrations after he replaced into hanged have been additionally fixed, take a glance back 7 years Iraq replaced into in a greater advantageous place under Saddams rule. He nonetheless has many followers in Iraq and as an insult to them he replaced into hanged on a particular islamic day (like shooting george bush on yuletide day) all of it is going right down to shape contracts for american companies and the administration of oil supplies. It replaced into not a honest Islamic trial, the entire trial replaced into controllled by using the individuals interior the history, whilst it includes those issues u . s . a . and uk would say they're allies yet whilst it includes the crunch uk has no say yet purely follows u . s . a . like slightly puppy canines

2016-12-11 17:38:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I've heard ol' Saddam wasn't well endowed actually at all!! LOL I just had to say that!!

2006-12-28 04:19:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Bush, blair and all the other politicians who have nothing else to do than WAR.

And we should elect smb to bring that so much wanted world peace

2006-12-28 05:10:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Rosie O' Donell.

2006-12-28 04:14:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Mugabe of Zimbabwe

2006-12-28 04:17:37 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 1 2

No, not even Saddam shoul be hung.

Revenge is an excuse never an answer

2006-12-28 04:13:59 · answer #8 · answered by Obtuse Triangle Fan 4 · 5 3

Ben Ladin of course, however, I think Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears and hell why not George W. Bush!

2006-12-28 04:14:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

Saddam should not be hung. The death penalty is barbaric.

2006-12-28 04:14:12 · answer #10 · answered by Minmi 6 · 2 4

73% of the human race.

2006-12-28 04:14:00 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers