English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
33

I get so tired of seeing you blame everything on Bush.

You do realize that your vehement hatred towards Bush may not actually make him a terrible president. There have been quite a few presidents that were widely unpopular during their term but are now regarded as good presidents. Consider Ford. Consider Truman... the guy set the record for lowest approval rating at 22%, and is today regarded as one of our best presidents.

I'm not saying that I am an outright Bush supporter. I'm just saying that you should probably give it a rest. Your whining is unbecoming, divisive, and will be much forgotten in the future when the effects of this president's policies are being weighed.

2006-12-28 03:07:24 · 21 answers · asked by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6 in Politics & Government Politics

Sean - look at the deficit adjusted for GDP. It has been higher many times in the past.

2006-12-28 03:15:21 · update #1

Aggressive warfare against a sovereign nation? Seriously?
Remember people that the first Gulf war never ended. A cease fire was brokered on the condition of several UN considtions, all of which were broken.
Don't feed me the crap that we invaded Iraq.

2006-12-28 03:23:28 · update #2

21 answers

i never liked him.
but now that he killed James Brown ...
i kinda like him

2006-12-28 03:09:30 · answer #1 · answered by ken y 5 · 5 3

nicely... in the start... basically speaking about even if his failed regulations on that particular day (because it kind of feels that's almost each and daily that he fails someplace else)... is basically speaking about cutting-edge activities... many human beings communicate about cutting-edge activities... that's not that uncommon...(heck, I see you adult males nonetheless bashing Clinton, hahaha) yet the different element is... Bush somewhat beat Kerry... even although he did not seem that good of a candidate... with the point to come back that close... i imagine human beings were operating extremely difficult... and "taking responsibiltiy" for dropping an election... is somewhat bit a stupid theory... considering many did artwork very difficult... each from time to time you basically do not win... and there would not seem plenty you may do about it... I recommend i imagine a lot of human beings did not favor to modify after 9-11 and interior the midst of a conflict on 2 fronts... and that is almost comprehensible... even although now, numerous i understand remorseful about the alternative in hindsight... and likewise... in case you do not stay in an section that's "up for grabs"... like an ohio or Florida... most of the time... it would not make a huge massive difference, fantastically in elements that vote heavily dem or republican traditionally.... with the way the electoral college is determined up... once you're attentive to that... AND finally... why did not you campain harder in 2006? were you all basically lazy? were those the superb applicants you need to arise with? heavily?

2016-12-01 06:28:46 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Americans will never get over the fact of a "selected" president in a free country as the U.S. He will never be accepted, failed before he started.

2006-12-28 03:17:30 · answer #3 · answered by edubya 5 · 2 0

Initiation of agressive warfare against another soveriegn country is a war crime. George Bush is a war criminal.........that is beyond debate. Remember that Saddam was our right hand man while it served our interests (pics of Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam, etc.) Please don't excuse Bush's crimes by citing Saddams crimes and shortcomings. If you're comfortable with having a war criminal as our national leader you are part of the problem. I'm not so much anti-Bush as I am pro-American. We live in the greatest Country in history, and to see it dragged down and degraded by such a small mind (Bush, NOT you) is frustrating, to say the least.

2006-12-28 03:17:21 · answer #4 · answered by immature_old_fool 2 · 0 3

Many of yahoo answerers are not having Bush bashing as their sole aim in life. Questions / issues / problems for which they believe Bush is directly responsible - they have been answering directly and frankly. Since Bush, at least as believed by majority of people of the world, appears to be cause of enromous problems in mid-east, the answers tend to look like Bush bashing.

2006-12-28 03:14:43 · answer #5 · answered by ramshi 4 · 0 3

I hate bush. he has done nothing to help the country.....


(except boost the economy, revolutionize homeland security, deal with terrorism finally, and keep dangerous dictators in check.) These people that bush bash are mostly uneducated about the facts, which is why they do it in the first place

2006-12-28 03:13:50 · answer #6 · answered by daniel g 3 · 3 2

Its 1984 all over again and we're in Hate Week. Liberals are so controlled by their party that they do not know what to think. In fact, they don't want to HAVE to think. They want to be told and to do.

That is why they all parrot the Bush hatred. The man isn't a perfect president, but he is a whole heck of a lot better than that joke of a president before him.

2006-12-28 03:10:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 9 4

It's just the same thing everyday with the Bush bashers. They wake up and start calling him a liar and the worst person on Earth. Just get used to it, they'll never change.

2006-12-28 03:10:49 · answer #8 · answered by Abu 5 · 2 3

The liberal whining also feeds the flames of the insurgents and gets Americans killed, but they do not care about that price, they can blame it on President Bush.

2006-12-28 03:11:01 · answer #9 · answered by 007 4 · 6 3

Amen!

I am so sick and tired of the liberals trying to undermine our country with their campaign against our President. They lost the election, so they cry and whine like a bunch of toddlers who had their ball taken away.

Isn't it amazing that, since the Democrats won, there hasn't been any news stories about disenfranchised voters? How did it happen that one election, there are millions of people who weren't allowed to vote, but merely two years later, all voting problems have disappeared.

Weird, huh?

.

2006-12-28 03:11:05 · answer #10 · answered by Spanky 2 · 6 4

Anyone who screws up as often as bush should expect to be critisized,If he would do or say ANYTHING positive,I'd praise him,I just haven't seen it.....

2006-12-28 03:53:21 · answer #11 · answered by festeringhump 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers