English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-28 02:05:01 · 12 answers · asked by deadrat 4 in Politics & Government Government

12 answers

Looking at the state of the country, not enough, but then Blair only cares about his own image on the international stage. He thought a war in Iraq would make him the next Winston Churchill, so he lied about the need to go there, and has brought shame on our democratic heritage.

2006-12-29 11:28:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No the area close to it. He in suitable actuality has now no longer been a too undesirable PM, sufficient the Iraq conflict is his bigest downfall. even regardless of the indisputable fact that on the same time as you bear in strategies Thatcher and the ballot Tax. Ted Heath and the three Day Week, Jim Callaghans winter of Discontent, Anthony Edens Suez dilemma, Winston Churchills Apathy during the 40 5 elections, the final Strike, Loyd Georges reforms, Balfours blunders and shortage of understanding of the weapons of August in 1914, I advise there are particularly in basic terms some PM's that have one or 2 nasty shows. even regardless of the indisputable fact that the worst by an prolonged shot would decide directly to be for Me the Gladstone eras, particularly a great type of stupid strikes, undesirable judgement calls and various wars in the Empire began through capacity of idiotic strikes and advise.

2016-12-15 09:44:19 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I haven't added it up, but less than he should. However as he has no affinity with the English people I suppose that he is safer out of the country. If you want a guess I would say 50% maximum, but more to the point he is only 10% behind Britain.

2006-12-28 19:00:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not enough as he's far too busy trying to solve the rest of the world's problems, Africa, Asia, Iraq, America, China etc. It's not like Britain has any issues that this cockroach needs to deal with now is it.

2006-12-28 22:52:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Less time than he should, is my guess. He always seems to be flying off somewhere or other. Probably escaping from PMs questions in the H of C.

2006-12-28 02:20:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Given his track record I vote for him spending as time as possible out of the UK so he makes fewer mistakes such as the debacle in Iraq.

2006-12-28 05:48:33 · answer #6 · answered by James Mack 6 · 1 0

I would estimate 65% in the UK

2006-12-28 02:12:04 · answer #7 · answered by Police Artist 3 · 0 0

As little as possible is fine with me. Less time to cause any more trouble.

2006-12-29 07:25:04 · answer #8 · answered by S 4 · 1 0

Why do you want to know? I would imagine it is about 75%

2006-12-28 02:21:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Who cares and plus he has to travel due to his work, why are people so bothered about him going on holiday.

2006-12-28 02:18:02 · answer #10 · answered by Annie M 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers