does anyone remember when america made cloning legal? ive been reading that we are on the verge of eating cloned animals and this disturbes me. they have cloned livestock ready to butcher, unless its being slipped in now.... i distinctly remember anti cloning was the way, now today boom we gotta whole enertprise.
and if they already passed that; how long (if it isnt happening now) till they are able to clone homosexual couples to get an actual resembalance of both parents? or the more obvious body parts.
what if you could clone your head....nah being more realistic, a penis and then if youre 30 when you do that, by the time youre 50 you can pick it up from the local hospital and have a 20 year old penis again.
isnt the future of cloning full of possibilities? wow, if i dont think so
2006-12-28 02:01:12 · 6 answers · asked by joe citizen 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
I think cloning holds some valuable possibilities. Think of what it would be like if we were able to clone blood. We would never have to worry about donor shortages. The same goes for organs. If we can figure out how to clone specific organs by themselves, we can solve a lot of the problems the world faces.
2006-12-28 02:19:06 · answer #1 · answered by pdigoe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I actually just read an article in Yahoo! news that had stated that even though cloned animals have been tested to be completly normal they arent even thinking about putting them on the food market for a good amount of years. Also, some companies are still insisting on putting labels on their products to ensure consumers they are not purchasing food from cloned animals.
2006-12-29 07:15:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Identical twins are clones, so you may well have eaten beef from a clone quite often in the past.
Are you suggesting we need a law against twins?
I very much like your fresh outlook on law, "making things legal"! LOL. How would there have been a law aginst something before it existed, assuming you mean lab-engineered cloning? Are there any other technologies which have yet to be discovered that we should make laws aginst now, before they are discovered, so that when they are discovered we can decide whether or not to make them legal?
2006-12-28 02:08:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cloning and duplication are two different things. Cloning is just a genetic copy. There's no risk of anything bad happening to you from cloned animals.
Uh... you wouldn't "clone" a homosexual couple. You'd mix the DNA from two sperm or two eggs instead of from one sperm or one egg.
2006-12-29 00:15:13 · answer #4 · answered by Sean 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The cloning of animals has always been legal in the USA.
Your speculations are completely senseless, and I hope you know that.
2006-12-28 05:22:06 · answer #5 · answered by panda_glam 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You had an extremely extreme fever as an adolescent, did no longer you. McCain gave the terrorists permission to attack? you have documentation of any fabrication? The President does not have the potential to alter deficits, oil expenditures, bankrupcies, foreclosure, etc., the Democratic Congress does. training, wellness care, roads/bridges, poverty and homelessness gets worse? you have self assurance the Democrats are going to rectify all those issues and we will not ought to pay one unmarried dime to prevail? enhance Halliburton, conflict contractors and massive oil, how does all that artwork to the internal maximum benefit of our President? might you quite enhance the Rev. Wright?
2016-11-24 19:56:08 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋